In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

924 - Misplaced Emphasis - Aadhaar, Radiagate and Cablegate

03 DECEMBER 2010
 
Aadhaar, Radiagate and Cablegate
 
Issues of privacy are cropping up in three events of immense importance to people in India and across the globe and it is necessary to put the discussion in perspective. The events are:

Aadhaar, the 12 digit number by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to be provided to every citizen.

Radiagate, a scam involving transcripts of telephone that points out the collusion between government, business houses and media in India.

Cablegate, is the leak detailing cable correspondence between the United States Department of State and its diplomatic missions.

In Aadhaar the basic demographic and biometric information - photograph, ten fingerprints, iris of eye will be stored, and hence, takes us close to do away with multiple identities. As this can be verified online in a cost-effective manner, it is said that this can be effectively used to target various public welfare schemes. Equally important is its intrusion into people's privacy and this cannot be overlooked.

Nira Radia, a powerful and influential public relations person, was lobbying for .Raja to get the telecom ministry who in turn obliged with largess to the corporate houses and in this the media has been somewhat silent. A glimmer of hope has been the social media that has kept up the ante. To top it all, one of the corporate biggie, Ratan Tata, has gone to the Supreme Court stating that the revealing of the transcripts is an intrusion into individual privacy.

Wikileaks, which publishes leaked documents pointing out government and corporate misconduct has from 28 November 2010 started the Cablegate leaks. This will be done in a phased manner, but from the 251,287 documents that are likely to be put up,  130,000 are unclassifieds, 100,000 are confidential and 15,000 are secret and none are 'top secret'. Opinion about the leak is already divided. One view is that this  puts the conduct of diplomatic activity under jeopardy and that the stealing and dissemination of classified information surmounts to criminal activity. Others have hailed this activity as a freedom of speech and are aghast that a democratic government that should be open and transparent had hidden information from public scrutiny.

When it comes to have nots then information should be available for all (Aadhaar) for effective reach of public welfare schemes. When it comes to haves then information of national importance become matters of privacy (Ratan Tata's response to Radiagate). When it comes to nations then matters of global importance become matters of treason (a possible US response to Cablegate).

In reality, Aadhaar intrudes into people's privacy that is hidden under the guise of reaching out.  Radiagate exposes the nexus of money and power against people, that is hidden under the guise of public relations (nay, a private and personal chat). And, Cablegate exposes the intrusion into national sovereignty that is hidden under the guise of diplomatic exercise.

Posted by Srijit Mishra at 5:01 PM