In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

963 - A Swipe in Time - UIDAI Cards

Darshana Rai, 65, seethed with anger as she stood at the tail end of a long queue outside a community centre in Rohtak, a dusty town 75km west of Delhi. “With every new government comes a new scheme. What a waste of time!” fumed Rai, a housewife. Inside the community centre, a large hall with
cream-yellow walls and Mediterranean blue windows, four data-entry operators subcontracted by the state-owned Punjab National Bank (PNB), were enrolling account holders for Haryana’s new electronic scheme to route social-sector benefits like old-age and widow pensions.
Rai has every reason to be sceptical.
 
The money due to her, part of India’s vast, leaky social-security funding network, is presently routed so inefficiently via village heads, sarpanchs, that it threatens to throw national finances, and the UPA government’s political agenda of inclusive growth, off track.
 
Over the next five years, the Centre will spend $250 billion (R11.5 trillion) on subsidies, including old-age pensions, healthcare and the national jobs-for-work programme. Of this, at least 40% ($100 billion) will be siphoned off, mostly by “ghosts” (fake or undeserving recipients), estimates brokerage CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets.
 
That’s enough to bankroll India’s largest handout – the food subsidy of R55,000 crore ($12.4 billion) – more than seven times over.
 
With the government increasingly veering around to the view that direct cash payments into the bank accounts of beneficiaries is the answer, bypassing official middlemen (like the sarpanchs), the project in Rohtak is a harbinger of what might be.
 
The problem, presently, is that only 40% of India’s 1.2 billion people have bank accounts. Of India’s 600,000 villages, only 30,000 have bank branches. Contrast that with Britain, where 95% of its people have bank accounts.
 
The government can save R1 trillion a year – enough to reduce its fiscal deficit by more than 20% or fund the forthcoming Food Security Act – by channeling cash via bank accounts, says a study from consulting firm McKinsey and Co.
 
But banks can’t be everywhere. So, the operators in Rohtak work not for the bank but for Seed Infrastructure and Solutions (P) Ltd, a banking correspondent (BC), a bank-appointed company that provides financial services in unbanked areas. Last month, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) allowed for-profit companies and individuals – retired bank employees, ex-servicemen, public call office operators – to become BCs with banks.
 
The BCs extend these services by tapping into India’s infotech prowess, using hand-held electronic swipe devices called point of service (POS) machines or mobile phones.
 
Armed with laptops, biometric registration machines and webcams, the Rohtak operators worked feverishly. After 30 minutes, it was Rai’s turn to be enrolled. She gave one of the operators the information they sought, called in banking parlance KYC, know your customer, details: name, father’s/husband’s name, address, annual income and a copy of her election identity card. After keying in the information, the operator took Rai’s biometric details (two thumbprints) and a photo. Rai, who never had a bank account, will soon get a no-frills, zero-balance account into which her R700-a-month government old-age pension will be deposited.
 
By 2012, the RBI wants such no-frills banking outlets or BC networks in 75,000 villages. On offer will be savings, credit and remittance facilities.
 
Can India do a Brazil?
 
Ensuring that every rupee reaches the person it is meant for, as Brazil’s popular cash-transfer scheme Bolsa Famila Programme (BFP) shows, can strengthen India’s fight against poverty. BFP transfers cash via banks to poor Brazilian families on the condition that their children attend school and are vaccinated.
 
According to a World Bank study, BFP, which reaches 12.7 million families, helped lift 20 million people out of poverty between 2003 and 2009.
 
In that time, poverty – based on a purchasing power parity of less than $2 a day – fell from 22% of Brazil’s population to 7%. The income of Brazil’s poor grew seven times faster than that of the rich, and three times the national average. Inequality in the country is now at a 30-year low.
Brazil has 12.71 bank branches per 1,000 adults; India has 10.11.
 
“The building blocks and policy framework (for financial inclusion) are in place,” said Usha Thorat, who retired as RBI deputy governor in November. “Today, it is possible to have a viable business model for providing affordable financial services.”
 
“For the banks, more customers mean more income from disbursing cash transfers,” said Anirban Roy, managing director, Seed. His company has opened at least 1.5 million accounts in 17 states for different banks. On Monday, RBI governor D Subbarao urged commercial banks to see financial inclusion as an “opportunity rather than an obligation” and use technology to achieve their targets.
 
“What is required now,” said Thorat, who in her 38 years at the apex bank also handled the financial-inclusion portfolio, “is scaling up, for which banks need to take strategic steps and make concerted efforts.” To scale up quickly and efficiently, banks are using BCs like Seed to reach unbanked areas and people like Rai with the help of technology.
 
A few meters from Rai at the community centre was Karan Singh, a frail 75-year-old unhappy with the government-pension scheme and unconvinced by the new efforts. “Dead people still get pension. I am alive but I don’t get it regularly,” he said. “Last month, I was in the hospital and the sarpanch returned the pension to the department. Now I don’t know how to recover it.”
 
Once he gets a bank account, Singh’s pension will never be sent back to the government; it will remain in his savings account and earn interest. By electronic transfers to the biometric-backed accounts, the government can weed out the ghost pensioners.
 
The icing on the cake: once included in the banking system, Rai and Singh will not have to go to a faraway branch to withdraw their pensions.
 
On a designated day, a Seed employee will go to their village with a swipe machine, match their biometric details and hand over the pensions. The account holders will be given transaction slips in Hindi and an interactive voice response system will inform them of the transaction details.
 
In future, Rai, Singh and others like them would also have access to loans, insurance, money transfer and overdraft facilities via the banking channels.
 
Despite these obvious advantages, enrolling new account holders is difficult. “The village heads often create hassles because they see the government-bank-people link a threat to their power,” explained Saurav Kanti Dev, senior manager, Seed.
 
Seed also runs one-room kiosks for PNB in bigger villages, through which account holders can withdraw or deposit up to R5,000 per transaction per day via a swipe machine.
THE UIDAI BACKUP
 
Some bankers say financial inclusion may not be cost-effective in the long-run. “The Centre must subsidise some portion of the costs to make it viable,” said Gobinda Banerjee, general manager, PNB. There are teething problems too: Lack of trained manpower and an insufficient number of POS machines.
 
The next big push to the programme, some say, will come from the Nandan Nilekani-led Unique Identification (UID) programme, Aadhar, a national project to give every Indian resident an exclusive digital identity.
 
Ashok Pal Singh, deputy director general, Unique Identification Authority of India, explained how Aadhar could push the financial-inclusion programme.
 
“While enrolling for an UID, citizens can indicate that they need an account. In Temli (Maharashtra), where the UID project was launched, 1,500 people were enrolled. Nearly 97% of them wanted one (a bank account). None had an account, though there is a bank half a kilometre from Temli,” Singh said.
 
Individual data gathered by Aadhar will be enough to meet the KYC requirements of banks, said Singh.
 
“The UID will be a powerful instrumentality for helping poor people establish their identity to meet bank’s KYC norms,” Subbarao said last month.
 
Some banks, however, are not convinced. They want more stringent background checks of new account holders when enrolled to prevent fraud. Singh said there would be no trade-off between security and inclusion in a UID-tagged account because the Authority’s encryption technology is of the “highest quality available”.
 
To allow transaction in real-time and increase the BC coverage, Aadhar has proposed microATMs (micro automated teller machines). A BC can use a microATM to connect to the bank, authenticate customers and perform transactions – either via mobile phones or the Internet. But it cannot store or dispense cash.
 
Wiring rural India so this can all happen is the responsibility of the R20,000-crore public information infrastructure project – to link every gram panchayat to broadband in three years – headed by Sam Pitroda, adviser to the PM on public information infrastructure.
 
“Once this ecosystem (microATMs, Internet and mobile connectivity) develops,” Nilekani said, “a migrant worker in Delhi will be able to send cash to his hometown, effortlessly and without wasting money on intermediaries.”
 
Source:- HT