In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

1144 - National Seminar Rejects UID Number Project - Counter Currents

National Seminar Rejects UID Number Project
By Dr Anuja

22 February, 2011
Countercurrents.org

Participants Endorsed the Statement of Concern on UID Number Seeking Stoppage of the Scheme

Patna 21/2/2011: A National Seminar was organized jointly by A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies (ANSISS), Patna, INSAF and Citizen's Forum for Civil Liberties, New Delhi on "Idea of Unique Identification (UID) Number/ Aadhaar Project" on 21st Feb 2011 at ANSISS, Patna.

The chief guest Dr. Usha Ramanathan noted Jurist of Supreme Court, emphasized on the concept of UIDAI. The Unique Identification Authority of India is an agency of the Government of India responsible for implementing the envisioned Multipurpose National Identity Card or Unique Identification card (UID Card) project in India. It was established in February 2009, and will own and operate the Unique Identification Number database. The authority will aim at providing a unique number to all Indians. The authority would provide a database of residents containing very simple data in biometrics.

She focused on the issue and said that UID is basically a control of Identity through Technology. UID project is about Technology and application of Technology. But she also stressed that we should be able to control technology and neither the technology nor the people who control the technology should control us. This issue is now two years old and numbers of claims have been made on the UID by Mr. Nandan Nilekeni who started the project.

Most reports suggest that the plan is for each Indian citizen to have a unique identification number with associated identifying biometric data and photographs by 2011. However, other reports claim that obtaining a unique number would be voluntary, but those that opt to stay out of the system will find it very inconvenient: they will not have access to facilities that require you to cite your ID number. She gave an example of Mizoram where people refused to take UID numbers because for them the numbers are the mark of a devil.

Through this seminar she wanted to put the negative implications of the projects. There are many potential privacy fallouts of this project. Risks that arise from this include possible errors in the collection of information, recording of inaccurate data, corruption of data from anonymous sources, and unauthorized access to or disclosure of personal information. Other countries with national identification systems have confronted numerous problems with similar risks such as trading and selling of information, India is ill-equipped to deal with such problems. So, it is important to stop this project and for this public domain is important and people should know the real concept of UID.

Mr. Gopal Krishna, Citizen's Forum for Civil Liberties, New Delhi, during his presentation mentioned about the emergence of UID and what UID number stands for. He said it a twelve digit ID consisting person's photo, finger print and few more general information like age, sex etc. he also said that it not merely for the citizens but for the residence in which citizens' will be in subset.

Mr. Anil Chaudhary from INSAF Delhi, during the session emphasized on this issue and said that this concept was first started by the corporate sector and later rest of them followed it. This programme or project is good for the rulling class but will not stand beneficial for the ruled. He also said that to establish a biometric machine number of things are required like: machine itself, computer, connector between both Internet facilities and the most important electricity. It is a revival plan of IT sector. In the capitalist regime this project will not become successful the only thing from this project will be collected and that is money.

Mr. Joe Athialy in the second session focused on World Bank in India and in UID.

The seminar was processed with the vibrant discussions. Participants in the seminar animously resolved to prepare a pamphlets and booklets in simple language for common people to make them aware for UID. 

Prof. Nil Ratan, Prof. Ajay Kumar, Dr. Ajit Hansda, from ANSISS, Vasudev jee, Mr. Ajit Kumar, Mr. Arun Kumar, Mr. Pushpraj, Mr. Naval Kishore and Mr. Uday Chandra all said that debate on this issue should be done. We should take feedback from the public for resolution on this.

Prof. D M Diwakar, Director of the Institute cordially welcomed and presented vote of thanks to the participants and speakers assembled at A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna, Bihar. He briefly explained the theme and highlighted the necessary aims and objectives of this seminar. Objective analysis is required for UID and its implications on common people. Question remains as how technology should reach to common people easily to solve their problems and protect their privacy and liberty.

Dr. Anuja
Member
Seminar Committee
A N Sinha Institute of Social Studies (ANSISS), Patna- 01
http://www.countercurrents.org/anuja220211.htm