In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, February 6, 2011

1108 - India's Aadhaar Project to give identities to 1.2 billion people


Posted on 05 February 2011 by Bamboo Offshoot
By Harsh Vathsangam

Nandan Nilekani, co-founder of Infosys Technologies and current chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India, is spearheading the movement to provide all Indians with an identification number. Photo: Times of India

On the September  29, 2010, Rajna Sadashiv Sonwane from the tribal village of Tembhli in Nandurbar, India, received a letter from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. She had been allotted the number 7824-7431-7884.

This set off what could be described as arguably the most ambitious national identification program the world has ever seen.

The program is called the Unique Identification (UID) project, or Aadhaar (meaning “foundation”), and aims to give every one of 1.2 billion Indians a unique identification number. The number is linked to the person’s demographic and biometric information. It can be used to identify them anywhere in India and allow them to access a host of benefits and services.

The benefits of such a scheme in a country where millions of people do not even have addresses or surnames let alone documentation of their existence cannot be highlighted enough.

The organization entrusted with this responsibility is the Unique Identification Authority of India . At the helm of affairs is Nandan Nilekani, co-founder of Infosys Technologies and a poster boy of India’s recent IT-driven economic success and a much-admired technocrat with a well-established track record. The appointment of Nilekani to the post of chairman lent much credibility to the organization’s motives and continues to be a driving factor in its success.

Over the next 4 years, UIDAI plans to issue 600 million UIDs – twice the population of the United States – specifically targeting India’s rural and marginalized regions. At its peak, at least 1 million names will be added to the database per day.

To further comprehend the sheer scale of this exercise: when fully implemented, each person’s identity will have to be verified against 1.2 billion others to check for authenticity.

The Aadhaar project aims to give a voice to the unheard.

“The ‘Aadhaar’ unique identification number will enable inclusive growth and development for the deprived and will act as an instrument of social inclusion,” said Nilekani at a lecture organized by The Editors Guild of India .

If successful, India has much to gain. Government-run public services are notorious for widespread bribery, corruption and lack of transparency. For example, a shocking two-thirds of government distributed grains never reach the poor due to theft and adulteration at the middle levels. Providing infallible proof of identity with UIDs and biometric markers when collecting rations would improve accountability and make it difficult to fool the system.

Similar controls could be used during elections to curb voter fraud. The UID is also expected to be an important enabler for another of India’s ambitious projects: the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme , which guarantees 100 days of work to any rural household willing to do public work-related unskilled labor. Often the 41 million beneficiaries of this scheme cannot think of opening a bank account let alone setting up deposits, since they possess no form of identification. Using the UID would greatly smooth the payment process.

The UID will also be linked to existing identity databases such as passports, voter IDs, drivers licenses, border IDs, and more. Financial, health, communication, and educational organizations will have the option of building services on the basic UID platform to universalize customer identities across the nation and allow for the transfer of records. It is easy to see that the sky is the limit when it comes to the potential benefits of the program – if successful.

Critics of the project argue that it will lead to an invasive state and cause clashes between individual privacy and national security . The use of a centralized database heightens the risk of misuse of personal information. These are valuable points that need to be addressed eventually and the onus is on the government to back up this exercise with clear, well-established laws to preserve the rights and privacy of its citizens. Drafts of such laws are already available online .

Others point to the sheer size and scale of the project, implying that inaccurate, repeated or corrupted data are inevitable. Often, these critics make comparisons to similar attempts in other regions such as the United Kingdom. Even in places like the UK, which is more developed and has a smaller population, such projects have failed .

The government for its part is sparing no measure to ensure that this project is a success. A sum of U.S. $ 21.7 million was approved in the 2009-2010 union budget to fund the agency in its first year. This was further increased to U.S. $400 million for the following year – numbers that are likely to increase.

However, numbers only convey half the story. The most remarkable aspect of this venture is that the majority of the team members involved are volunteers, accepting either minimal or no pay and often taking sabbaticals from their regular jobs. Leading from the front is Nilekani himself, having relinquished the chairmanship of one of the most successful companies in Indian corporate history to join the project in 2009.

Closer examination reveals a myriad of profiles, each a story in itself. Take for example Raj Mashruwala, who first moved to the U.S. in 1976 to pursue a master’s in engineering from the University of California at Berkeley and founded successful companies in the software manufacturing industry. Or Michael Foley, a celebrated Bangalore-based designer who created the baton for the Indian Commonwealth Games 2010.

Lawyers, corporate consultants, journalists, students barely out of college (and not all Indian) have mailed in their applications, hoping to make meaningful contributions. In a sense, this exemplifies what the government has been trying to do for decades: getting talented, world-class citizens to work for the benefit of India with no apparent gains other than the satisfaction of having made a difference.

Time will tell whether the project will succeed or fizzle out as a failed exercise in good governance. But one thing is for sure: the Aadhaar project reflects the aspirations, needs and sheer gall of a country that marches into growing world power by going where no country has gone before.

What’s at stake is the welfare and livelihood of the 1.2 billion people that call India their home.

For more information on the Aadhaar project, visit http://uidai.gov.in .

Watch Nandan Nilekani’s talk about India’s future at the 2009 TED Conference here .