In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

1145 - Why we don't need an "Aadhar"? by Gajendra Sidana - Rambling Brook Blogspot

Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Why we don't need an "Aadhar"?
Dear Mr. PM,

I am writing this to bring to your notice a matter of serious concern which has been conspicuously not taken up enough by mainstream media. While I have great respect for your vision, acumen and capabilities, I feel the confines of Z+ security at Race Course road has somewhat taken you away from the common man of India. Few months back, you quietly handed the first Aadhar ID to a bunch of poor Indians thinking you have found the panacea of all the problems facing the country today. You, on suggestion of few individuals equally disengaged from ground realities (read Nandan Nilekani), assumed that a 12 digit number would solve all the problems like corruption, poverty and hunger that face this country. While you were busy visualizing ways this 12 digit number could help in elimination of corruption, people like A Raja, Kalmadi and ISRO officials were busy creating scams running into 12 digits right under your nose. I am pretty sure, your 12 digit "Aadhar" has no aadhar to tackle this kind of rampant corruption. I find Aadhar to be grossly misleading, dangerous and a big blow to exchequer for the following reasons:

Panacea for all evils:

The biggest justification given to Aadhar is that it can stop the pilferage in Public Distribution System (PDS). There is no denying that poor don't receive allotted food grains, benefits under Govt. schemes etc as expected but that is not only because of lack of identity. In-fact if you travel to villages, you will find that large majority of poor people do have identities like Ration Cards, BPL cards, Voter ID card etc but the PDS distributors/NREGA coordinators don't give them their full entitlements. Basically, they get their signatures/thumb impressions on much inflated quantities/amounts, where the excess is sold in black market/their pockets. Even if you provide these people with Aadhar, they will end up being the victim just like they have been so far. The way to address this issues is not creating a new ID but making the grievance addressing mechanism stronger, where even a poor guy can complain and get action done against the corrupt officials if he/she is not given his/her due.

Wastage of Public Money:

Election commission of India started issuing voter ID cards over a decade back and still is not rolled out completely. Even where it is rolled out, there are major errors in the data. My card spells my name wrongly, whereas each of my family members has some or other mistakes in their cards including date of birth, address etc. Despite being educated and informed, I couldn't get my voter ID card rectified. What makes you believe that Aadhar will be different? Will it not be one of those mammoth projects that never achieved what they were set out for?

Countries like UK, Australia etc. have tried similar projects in past but concluded them to be infeasible. What makes you think that we would be any different given the much bigger size of our country and much lesser per capita resource available to Govt.?

If we have to utilize all the advertised benefits of Aadhar, we will have to put in place huge infrastructure in place such as millions of biometric scanners, thousands of micro ATMs and internet connectivity at every point where Aadhar will be verified. Is India currently in a position to undertake these kind of investments when we don't have adequate roads, metros, fly-overs and electricity in all homes?

A rough calculation shows that if each PDS shop were to utilize Aadhar identification for disbursing grains, they will have to shelve out roughly 2.5 Lakh rupees. Do you really think those people can afford that kind of money without extracting even more profit through black-marketing? Basically you are giving them more motive to be dishonest.

No project feasibility study was ever taken, no cost benefit analysis done (atleast to public's knowledge) and national debate held in parliament. Never in my professional life have I seen a project even above 1 Million dollars go to the execution stage without a feasibility study, brainstorming and discussions. Here we are undertaking a project worth billions without any such study.

Identity/Privacy Issues:

In a country as diverse as ours, there is a very high probability of Aadhar being misused by the ruling Governments against certain sections of society. While I agree that post independence so far we have been lucky enough to have a fully functional democratic setup, thus precluding such incidents from happening but that is no surety for future. If we ever have a totalitarian regime in the future, Aadhar can be used for catastrophic end results. Who would have thought of Jews persecution in Germany by Hitler in early 20th century, say 1901 AD.

A few key strokes will yield complete lists of males, females, Muslim, Christian and Hindus in that district. Imagine this information getting into the wrong hands. The argument will be but Aadhaar database does not include religion. Is it not possible to get around this by searching the database using names for example names like Raman, Rehman or Raymonds? This can be extremely dangerous to say the least.

How can the system protect ‘Identity theft’ in such a vast population? One of the major issues in the western world is identity theft. Even in countries with a fraction of the population numbers of India, there are fraudulent people drawing government pensions and social security benefits for years using dead people's IDs. Identity theft is an international issue and a thesis can be written on the topic.

Does being a ‘poor’ person in India leave him or her unprotected from all issues related to invasion of their privacy? (This topic is best left to legal experts on privacy and human rights issues.)?

I know 7 Race course is too far for my voice to be heard so I have put it in my blog.

Regards,
Gajendra

at 9:20 PM Posted by Gajendra Sidana