In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, February 27, 2011

1159 - Not smart enough? - The Hindu

Sunday, Feb 27, 2011
SWATI NARAYAN

Smart card technology can be used to streamline India's unwieldy PDS. But it is yet to prove itself under real world challenges.
A shop too far: Carrying PDS supplies of foodgrain for the whole village 
16km from the PDS shop in Orissa.

Smart cards have become the latest buzzword to remedy India's public distribution system (PDS) — one of the largest food grain delivery networks in the world with more than 500,000 ‘ration' shops.

Electronic voting machines have streamlined Indian elections. Credit cards, which can be swiped for payment at any urban store, have transformed banking. Similarly, can the much talked about plastic smart cards reform the corrupt PDS? The PMO's Rangarajan panel has pinned all its hopes on it. But are they silver bullets?

Let's take a step back for just a moment.

What are these plastic smart cards? They have an embedded chip that can store and update varied types of information and are increasingly being used as train tickets, driver's license, health insurance and library cards.

For the PDS, smart cards can store food grain eligibility and, if required, fingerprint details of each household member. Compatible machines placed in ration shops then ‘read' this information and print a receipt for each transaction.

Some states have implemented pilot tests of these cards and my travels in the past three months reveal some of their ground realities.

Pocket-sized pilots

The Agriculture Minister in October 2010 had gone on record to proclaim, “ the smart card pilot has been successfully tested in Haryana and is ready to be rolled out nationwide.”

But, the most surprising revelation on the ground is the miniscule size of these Haryana pilots. Of the four districts selected, two had yet to start in the last quarter of 2010. Across Panchkula city, only three ration shops have been included. In each shop, only 10-35 smart cards have been issued. In neighbouring Chandigarh, too, the pilots are similarly pocket-sized.

More efficient: ‘Contactless' smart card readers used in Andhra Pradesh.

Teething troubles abound. The reader machines use a clearly outmoded software technology, which takes 5-7 minutes to process a single transaction. The batteries in most shops have collapsed, and the machines only work when there is electricity.

In all fairness, adaptation to new technology is always a slow process. The currently fumbling, nascent Haryana pilot will officially take another two years to be competed. Till then isn't it entirely premature to pass a verdict?

Untested

The act of blindly issuing smart cards is also utterly meaningless, unless each transaction has a domino effect on the entire PDS supply chain — end-to-end. But these pilots have failed to explore three crucial aspects.

First, movement of grain across the supply-chain. Andhra's experiments with the superior technology of ‘contactless' smartcards, which transmit data via radio frequency identification waves, is the most promising. They can also potentially track identity tags embedded in every bag of food grain purchased from farmers. But, 3-5 years need to be invested to rollout an integrated pilot across the gigantic network of PDS warehouses even in a single district. This has yet to start.

Second, portability of entitlements. Inter-state migrants, in particular, would greatly benefit if they could use smart cards to purchase food grains from any shop. So far, however, none of these smart card pilots provide portability even between neighbouring shops, let alone across states.

Third, ability to embed the ration subsidy. Smart cards can potentially be used as electronic wallets by loading their chips with the ration subsidy. This could be a potential game-changer. But none of the pilots has tested its implications. How will the funds be uploaded regularly? How will they be automatically indexed to India's high food price inflation, now hovering above 15 per cent? Can Kenya's SMS-based mobile-money transfer system, M-PESA, which is a current rage in international policy circles, provide an alternative?

Since all these crucial features remain untested, it begs the question — as a technology, do smart cards have the potential to streamline the PDS? The short answer — Yes, definitely. Has this been proved? No, not yet.

Smart cards offer a technology of the future. But till they are fully tested, with an eye to real world challenges, can we please suspend judgment on the inherent ‘smartness' of these cards?

Swati Narayan is an independent social policy analyst. Email: swatinarayan@gmail.com

Keeping it simple

It is no secret that India's Public Distribution System (PDS) is plagued with leakages.

At the last mile of the world's largest network of food delivery of 500,000 fair price `ration' shops, an estimated 10-30 per cent of the food grains are pilfered through fake cards.

But the proposed Food Security Bill offers a window of opportunity for change. The National Advisory Council (NAC) has recommended that three-quarters of India's population should be entitled to PDS food grains. It would then make immense logical sense to invest in an exhaustive one-time exercise to ensure the uniqueness of each ration card issued.

Andhra Pradesh, which already has near-universal PDS coverage for 80 per cent of its population, is moving precisely in this direction. The civil supplies department is the lead registrar for Aadhaar's unique identification exercise (UID) and enrolment forms are being distributed at ration shops. This, in turn, proves to be a cost effective method for the department to clean up its centralised databases with each family member's biometric and iris information. Based on these unique numbers, the state government has begun to issue ration `smart' cards.

But, once these unique cards are distributed, is it then essential to again authenticate fingerprints on a biometric sensor at every purchase at ration shops? No, it is especially unnecessary in rural areas where the NAC proposes that 90 percent of the population be made eligible for rations. Besides, biometric authentication of each transaction is largely impractical and cumbersome.

For one, the conditions within ration shops are far from ideal. A pilot across 20 ration shops in Tamil Nadu, for example, revealed that due to high levels of dust, the fingerprint sensors have frequent breakdowns and identification errors. Now, the state government has decided to entirely abandon the use of biometrics in favour of simpler handheld billing devices used by bus conductors to print tamper-proof tickets. Two, regular maintenance remains a challenge. Credit card swipe machines often have service agreements which ensure that a technician checks it at least once a month. This is even more essential for the sensitive biometric sensors with high volume of monthly transactions of 500-1,000 cards in an average ration shop.

But, it is hard to imagine this level of maintenance across rural India.

Lastly, it will unduly inconvenience poor people. For example, in Orissa's remote tribal areas where ration shops are often as far as 16 km away from villages, each month 5-6 able bodied men usually journey in a cavalcade of bicycles to collect food grains for the entire hamlet, including the elderly. The writing is on the wall. Biometrics can be useful to create a unique identification for each eligible household. But their unnecessary overuse for authentication at every purchase at ration shops will only distance poor people even more from their rightful entitlements.