In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, August 5, 2011

1480 - A subprime crisis in the making - Economic Times

9 JUL, 2011, 02.25AM IST, SANDIP SEN,

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's lament that the media has dubbed his government as the 'most corrupt' may not be the only blot in his stint as a career economist and politician. A bigger crisis may haunt the nation during years to come due to short-sighted execution of policy initiatives of the UPA government led by the noted economist.

It is true that the UPA today is under intense pressure to roll back the momentum of the public opinion against it following the multiple scams that have been unearthed during the past few months. So, it has to think how to effectively counter the same on its feet, and win back popular mass support before the next elections.

The biggest and the most powerful strategic initiative of the UPA government to counter the popular backlash is likely to be the cash subsidy scheme powered by Nandan Nilekani's unique identity number (UID). This will allow the government to transfer cash directly to the bank account of the urban and rural poor and the farming community, both rich and poor. The subsidy on kerosene, diesel and LPG has been well over .`40,000 crore in 2010, while that on fertiliser worth around .`50,000 crore. This means a disbursement of nearly a trillion rupees annually across a subprime population segment of nearly half a billion people spread across the country is envisaged through the UID.

This is no mean task for even the most diligent and efficient task force considering that 90% of this subprime segment today has no bank account, zero literacy and no income source. The finance minister has said that the UID authority has given a plan to implement the scheme in three phases for LPG and fertiliser and two phases for kerosene that will cover all beneficiaries by March 2012.

According to the given road map, the administrative ministries, and not the UID task force, would launch pilot projects for the transfer of direct cash subsidy from October in the seven states of Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Assam, Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan and Orissa. Does this mean that consumers of these seven states will see higher prices of LPG, kerosene and fertiliser during the festival season of 2011 or will both the subsidies continue simultaneously?

According to Mr Nilekani, beneficiaries would receive subsidy transfers to their Aadhaar-linked bank accounts that could be accessed through various banking channels such as bank counters, ATMs, Internet and mobile banking. It will also have a transparency portal that would allow customers to check real-time stock movement of LPG and kerosene and see distributor-wise details. The system would have in-built checks and audits.

The key question will, however, be whether a foolproof transfer of funds can be effected to nearly half a billion poor and illiterate widely-dispersed individuals every month without an assortment of enabling or educated brokers as a bridge between the hi-tech system and an ignorant and desperately poor user.

Will they pawn their UID cards to the local retailer, distributor or a bank agent just for the sake of convenience? This is not to say that the poor must not be compensated for the fuel and fertiliser price rise. However, since these subsidies will be ultimately doled out by the concerned administrative ministries and not the UID authority, how shall one check if the system has not been rigged by the same men, who today are profiting from the black market of subsidised kerosene and diesel? After all, it is much easier to fix a computer coding system than burn a Yashwant Sonawane or shoot a Jyotirmoy Dey.

Unless Nilekani's UID authority operates the Aadhaar scheme on a buildoperate-transfer (BOT) basis for at least a decade, the transparency of such a disbursement mechanism can never be guaranteed. The petroleum ministry and the agriculture and fertiliser ministries that have done a poor job of subsidy disbursement till date will ensure that the cash gets siphoned out of the system and the country bears a permanent subprime payout that is hijacked by the officials and the brokers and keeps on spiralling in the years to come.

A trillion-rupee booty each year would be too lucrative for the politicians, the administrators and the mafia to ignore, and auditors can hardly be expected to keep count of checking with the half-a-billion uneducated poor spread across 3.28 lakh sq km of land mass. The Prime Minister will perhaps enhance his claim of bringing transparency in governance if he can actually convince the GoM and the Congress high command to let the UID authority operate Aadhaar on a BOT basis, and save the nation from a subprime crisis in the making.

(The author is an analyst and writes for print and online media in the US, Europe and Asia)