In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

1537 - T for protecting common man from graft Vajpayee’s vision and UPA’s dismay- Organiser

R.S.

INFORMATION Technology (IT) can play an important role in controlling black-money and corruption and ensure that the government subsidy reaches the targeted population without the involvement of a middleman. IT can also be very useful in proactively curbing other crimes.

The first step in this direction was taken by the Vajpayee Government in January 2004. It inserted section 14A in The Citizenship Act, 1955, that envisaged issuance of national identity card to every citizen. The purpose of this was to issue a unique identity (UID) in the form of a smart card to every citizen of the country. However, the UPA government lost more than five years and only in June 2009, the government appointed Infosys founder and vice chairman Nandan Nilekani as the head of Unique Identification Authority of India (UID-AI).

The UID project was to be designed in a hub and spoke model - with the ID system at the hub and various services accessing it as spoke. The entire data base was planned to be used intelligently for different applications. For example, when a person registers a property, he must give his UID number. Any authorised agency, just by the punch of few keys, could see how many properties stand registered against a particular UID, and his source of funding. This could have controlled black-money. In the US, through a specific search by name or surname, area, etc., one can get complete details of the seller, its prices, complete chain of owners of property, etc.

Similarly, police could book criminals using their UID numbers and their profiles can be maintained including their DNA, which can be very useful in curbing crime and improving conviction rate. Presently the hotels ask to provide an ID from people who want to stay there. Criminals provide fake IDs. However, with UID this can be completely eliminated as the hotel staff can dip into a common data base to verify the IDs.

Monitoring subsidy

The entire data base can be built on a flexible format to accommodate any change in government policies such as identifying different sets of needy people for targeted subsidy schemes.

Standardization

IT can be used to reduce the interaction of the common man with the public utility offices of the government. For this, the government should standardize the formats of various forms (for availing government services) and certificates (like Birth certificate, Death certificate, Caste certificate, Income certificate), applicable across the country. Only the language can be local but the format has to be exactly the same across the country. Efforts should be made to reduce number of forms substantially. Stating a UID number should be enough to get a service instead of writing complete name, address, etc.

India Search Engine:

On the pattern of US, the central government should come out with a search engine which can be used both by the general public (for getting publicly disclose-able information) on free/chargeable basis, and which can be used by the Government Agencies. This Search Engine should give the desired information through either selection of name or UIN. In the US, the Search Engine provides even the names and telephone numbers of the neighbourers, last three residential addresses, criminal records in all the States, ownership of the property, the previous owners of the property, purchase price of the property, place he is working, etc.