In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, August 8, 2011

1522 - Press Release: 'Privacy Matters Chennai' August 6th 2011


Press Release: 'Privacy Matters Chennai' August 6th 2011

On August 6th 2011, Privacy India in partnership with Citizen Consumer and Civic Action Group(CAG), Madras Institute for Development (MIDS), and IDRC, held “Privacy Matters Chennai” a public conference that provided a platform for a variety of discussions and perspectives on the topic of privacy in India.

The conference looked at the tensions between privacy and society with a specific focus on consumer privacy and privacy of telecommunications. Privacy India is a virtual entity that was established through the collaboration of Center for Internet and Society, an NGO based in Bangalore, and Society in Action Group, an NGO based in Delhi.
Prashant Iyengar, lawyer and lead researcher for Privacy India, opened the conference by explaining the mandate of Privacy India, which is to raise awareness, spark civil action and promote democratic dialogue around privacy challenges and violations in India. One of Privacy India's goals is to build consensus towards the promulgation of a comprehensive privacy legislation in India through consultations with the public, legislators and the legal and academic community.

Speaking in the keynote session was Dr. Santosh Babu, Sashi Kumar Menon, and R. Ramamurthy. Dr. Santosh Babu, the Secretary of IT for the Tamil Nadu Government shared his personal experiences with e-governance projects and privacy. He explained how e-governance projects, such as electronic grievance systems, can bring great benefits to all classes in society, they can also pose a risk to privacy, because they depend on the collection of information and formation of databases. Therefore, the pros and cons of every project developed must be weighed with privacy and impact in mind. Sashi Kumar
Menon , founder Chairman of the Media Development Foundation spoke on the relationship between the media and privacy. In his presentation he pointed out that care needs to be taken when addressing privacy and the media, as the right to privacy could, if not properly framed, work to censor the media rather than protect a fundamental right. R. Ramamurthy, the Chairman, Cyber Society of India spoke about different threats to national security that the internet has brought about. Because of these threats, when it is a case of national security, national security must take precedence.

In the first session, Usha Ramanathan, advocate and social activist and Mrs. Desikan, Consumer Association of India, spoke on privacy and telecommunications. Mrs. Ramanathan pointed out that telecommunications are just one way in which the State is collecting information about individuals. New initiatives such as the UID and other e-governance projects also work to build databases and collect information about individuals. This collection of information is a threat to individual privacy as people lose the ability to control who has access to their information, what that information says about them, and how that information is used. Mrs. Ramanathan also spoke about the new draft Privacy Bill, pointing out that we should look at what the Privacy Bill is protecting in terms of privacy, but also what the Bill is accepting as areas that need privacy protection. Mrs. Desikan spoke predominately about consumers rights in concern with telecommunications and telemarketers. Members of the audience voiced their discontent over the telemarketing calls that they receive multiple times a day. Mrs. Desikan responded to these complaints by pointing out that though TRAI can do a better job of enforcing regulations and bringing redress for violations, it is also the responsibility of the consumer to know the contracts that they are signing and the products that they are purchasing.

Also speaking in this session was Mr. S. Martin, Advocate and Consumer Activist. Mr. S Martin spoke on financial transactions and privacy. He argued that n individuals financial information should be held to the highest level of privacy, unless the information involves public money. In his presentation Mr. Martin emphasized to the  udience the importance of disclosing financial information only when consent has been given.

In the second session Dr Revathi, Associate Professor at the Dr. Ambedkar Law University in Chennai, looked at consumer privacy from a legal perspective. Noting that as consumers we are always exchanging personally identifiable information, and thus our privacy is always at risk, she talked about how consumer privacy is mainly concerned with how ones information is collected, what information is collected, and how that information is used. Her presentation highlighted different regimes and bodies that protect privacy in India such as the RBI, and discussed different obligations that corporates have in India to protect consumers privacy.

The last session focused on Privacy and Basic Rights/Needs. Dr. N Manimekalai , head of the gender studies department at the Bharathidasan University in Trychy, spoke on how protecting human rights of individuals can also work to protect their privacy. Her presentation highlighted how the lives of the underprivileged are concerned with privacy in many ways including: the right to sanitation, the right to shelter, the right to familial privacy, labor rights in the work place bodily integrity, the right to public space, and the right to clothing. Dr. N Manimekalai also spoke about how women face specific challenges to privacy such as lack of proper public restrooms and lack of privacy over personal choices concerning her body.

Speaking on privacy, natural resources, and the UID was Mr. Ramkumar. Mr. Kumar pointed out that when talking about natural resources - rights and entitlements are very important. What the UID seeks to do is to deny those who are not in the UID system entitlements, because you do not have the accepted identity. He also brought out the point that the UID will work to take away the informal sector in India, but the impact of this must be considered as currently, India is largely comprised of the informal sector.

Many themes relating to privacy were brought out over the course of the day. On one note the audience discussed different consumer violations they had experienced, and noted that consumers need to be aware of what information that is being collected, how that information is being used, and what are the forms of redress on can take if the information is abused. Over-collection of information by the Government was another theme. Members of the audience voiced concerns about the amount of information the Government is collecting through different schemes, and the way in which this will change the relationship between the State and the citizen. The need to protect the privacy of the underprivileged as a basic human right emerged as another theme.

“Privacy Matters Chennai' is the fifth of eight public consultations that Privacy India will be holding across the country. Please visit www.privacyindia.org for more information on upcoming events.

Thank you
Elonnai Hickok
Centre for Internet & Society
Bangalore India