In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, August 6, 2011

1495 - De-link national security from vote-bank politics, says Jaitley - The Hindu

Mumbai, July 25, 2011
Staff Reporter

Senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader Arun Jaitley said here on Sunday that people should de-link issues of national security from vote-bank politics.

“It is the society which creates the attitude for tackling terrorism. Anywhere else in the world, if any political party grows weak in its fight against terrorism, it would not be able to be in power. But in India, growing weak apparently becomes important in attracting vote-bank,” he said.

He was talking on ‘Threat to National Security' here on Sunday, in the wake of the recent terror attacks in the city.

He said when faced with the challenge of terrorism, people would have to decide whether to choose vote-bank politics or keep it separate from issues of national security. “This attitude will change the response of the government, the investigating agencies and the foreign policy.”

He said that no one dared to attack the United States after 9/11 because the people and government there had that strength. “We have to bring such strength in India, otherwise we will not be able to say that this [terror attacks] won't happen in Mumbai again,” he said.

“INTELLIGENCE FAILURE”

Apparently attacking All India Congress Committee general secretary Rahul Gandhi's views, he said the approach that “we should learn to live with terror” needed to be changed, and said the three blasts in the city on July 13 were a case of significant intelligence failure. “Your intelligence was sleeping. This in itself is a failure. You didn't know of the incident, there were no intercepts, interference in any module. This is intelligence failure,” he said.

Mr. Jaitley said the investigating agencies and the government had failed miserably even while dealing with other incidents of terrorism. “It was the FBI [Federal Bureau of Investigation] which told India that David Headley was behind the 26/11 attacks. Why didn't the media ask why our Anti-Terrorism Squad or the National Investigating Agency did not know of it?” he asked.

Calling the probe into the 26/11 terror attack a “casual investigation,” Mr. Jaitley said the trial and investigation of the case was the biggest proof of the failure of the Indian system. “It was such a big incident. But our investigation reached only one person who was found on the place with ammunition. Our investigators did not reach anywhere else. It was during the Chicago trial that the FBI gave us information.”

Lamenting the lack of a common criminal code against terrorism in the country, he said that if the United Progressive Alliance government could bring a common communal violence draft, it should also bring a common stringent legislation to deal with terrorism.

He said the UPA government had, time and again, showed a lack of resolve in dealing with the menace of terrorism and Maoism. “We are dealing with a special condition. Our neighbour is an epicentre of terrorism. We thus have to give a rethink to our foreign policy,” he said.

He raised questions on the effectiveness of the National Intelligence Grid. “There is a difference between intelligence and actionable intelligence. How can you give information about actionable intelligence to others? There are no firewalls around the grid. It is the same kind of grid from which Wikileaks came out,” he said.

He said the government had not even started working on the measures announced after the 26/11 attacks.

Mr. Jaitley said many lessons were to be learnt from the recent attacks. “The intelligence network should be such that there is an intimation prior to the attacks. Also, the response should be immediate and the culprits should be punished immediately.”