In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, August 13, 2011

1543 - Revamping PDS: a tale of two States - The Hindu

BHOPAL, August 12, 201
MAHIM PRATAP SINGH

A worker packs paddy bags for the rice mill.
Photo: P.V. Sivakum

Tired of its own inefficiency in plugging leaks and ensuring timely delivery of ration, the Madhya Pradesh government has decided to take the privatisation route to improve its ailing Public Distribution System.

The new system is being put in place by a corporate consortium led by HCL Infosystems with Edenred India Private Ltd ― a subsidiary of corporate meal voucher provider and multinational hospitality giant Accor ― and Virgo Softech Pvt. Ltd, an Indore-based IT firm as the other two members.

HCL will put in place a system to computerise the PDS apparatus and register beneficiaries to be linked with UID, while Edenred will print and provide the food coupons.

Virgo Softech will provide the IT manpower and enrolment teams for door to door registration, biographic and biometric data capturing.

With this, Madhya Pradesh will become the first State in the country to link its PDS to the UID with private participation on such a massive scale.

The State government’s move needs to be seen in the context of the larger national picture to scrap the existing Targeted Public Distribution System altogether and replace it with food coupons or cash transfers. The UPA government’s Chief Economic Advisor Kaushik Basu has vociferously advocated the deregulation of the PDS and moving to cash transfers or food coupons.

Interestingly in Madhya Pradesh’s case, HCL infosystems has provided highly inflated figures about the scope and coverage of the project on its website.

According to HCL, the contract would involve setting p an efficient food distribution system with “over 10 million expected transactions per month at Rs. 10.98 (per transaction per family) spread over 78 months”.

Based on these figures, the government ought to be paying the consortium Rs. 131.76 crore per year and over Rs.850 crore for the entire 78-month duration.

However, Dipali Rastogi, Commissioner, Food and Civil Supplies department corrects the figures provided by HCL thus.

“The total cost of implementation for a period of sixty months (not 78) comes to Rs. 454 crore or Rs.98 crore a month but we will be saving Rs. 420 crore by eliminating duplicate ration cards. So the cost to the government is next to nil. What HCL write on their website is their call,” says Ms. Rastogi.

But why privatise?

“Look, plugging leakages and rooting out corruption has proved to be beyond our core-competency. If we can have someone else provide these services on our behalf in a better and cost-effective manner, where is the problem? I admit it is a brave step, but necessary nonetheless,” says Ms. Rastogi.

However, the fact that UID can cure the problem of beneficiaries being left out of the PDS net is contested.

“UID can, at the most, address the problem of duplication of cards. But misclassification of families in the “BPL census” has little to do with identity fraud or “duplication”. Misclassification can occur when the criteria used for identification of BPL families are incorrect,” says development economist Reetika Khera.

“As for food coupons, they can be an important “last mile” authentication measure. However, the Bihar experience shows how this accountability measure can be undermined. For instance, in many cases, the coupons never reached card holders, they went straight into the hands of dealers; or dealers “charged” two months worth of coupons, while distributing only one month’s grains. The accountability measures can only work along with other safeguards, most importantly a good vigilance system, which in turn depends on political will,” says Ms. Khera.

According to UIDAI chairperson Nandan Nilekani the UID card will be voluntary but the MP government is going to make UID mandatory for PDS beneficiaries.

Chhattisgarh

While the Madhya Pradesh government has set an example of sorts by privatising the bulk of its PDS service, neighbouring Chhattisgarh achieved its much celebrated PDS revamp for a mere Rs. 4 crore.

How?

“We had our entire beneficiary database digitised by the National Informatics Centre (NIC). For better monitoring, we put in place a system of doorstep delivery of ration at the fair price shop and intimated people of it by SMS alerts. We also set up a dedicated call centre to receive complaints and grievances. Finally, we brought the supply chain under online monitoring to plug leakages,” says Rajeev Jaiswal, Joint Director, Chhattisgarh food and civil supplies department.

And why did Chhattisgarh decide to skip UID and food coupons?

“Look, the system that is in place is not faulty, its implementation is. We thought messing with the existing system would create a new set of problems. For instance, old or disabled people often have neighbours or relatives bring them their ration. That is not possible with the UID or food coupons. As for bogus cards, we eliminated over 2.5 lakh bogus cards through door-to-door physical verification,” says Mr. Jaiswal.