In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, August 5, 2011

1482 - Hackers may catch Indian banks napping by Samir Kelekar - Deccan Herald

"The UIDAI, another critical project for national security, is associated with the US companies with dubious credentials. " writes Samir Kelekar 

With the rising incidence of cyber crime, how safe is Internet banking in India? Samir Kelekar finds out


About two months ago, there was a major phishing attack on one of India's largest public sector banks.

I too received a phishing mail even though I didn’t even have an account in that bank then. When I checked with the bank if account holders had lost money, they were not sure.

Users, who enter their credentials in a phishing site and subsequently lose money, do not always admit what they have done. Instead, they blame the bank for losing money.

The increasing incidents of online fraud and hacking have put banks in a difficult position. Phishers are becoming more and more sophisticated and phishing mails have begun to appear in Hindi too, targeting the growing numbers of regional language Internet users. Also, it seems that the law applying to the loss of money in an Internet banking transaction is tilted against the banks.

A well-known legal expert says the liability of cyber crime, in which the customer is not a co-conspirator, is always on the banks. In other words, if a user loses her money, RBI may ask the concerned bank to compensate the user unless it can show that the user herself is involved in a conspiracy to steal the money.

So, even if there is no anti-virus on the user's computer or a key-logger is installed by a malicious hacker on the user's machine, banks would still be held responsible for the loss of money. To avoid these risks, experts say banks should come up with automated methods to ensure that the user's machine is secure before allowing her access to Internet banking.

But not many banks have realised the gravity of the situation and life goes on as usual for them. But surely it won't be long before banks start to realise how vulnerable they are. A chief information security officer (CISO) of a well known bank retorted when confronted with a blatant security hole in the bank's procedure: “Has a fraud happened? If not, why worry?”

This means that he will wake up only when the bank is swindled of significant money, and it may be too late then to plug the hole. The PSU banks usually do not reward performance adequately and hence, you can expect the bank personnel managing security to be not very highly motivated. Further, with their present salary structure, PSU banks fail to attract top security professionals.

Fortunately, in India the major frauds in banks are still not the ones involving hacking. In most circumstances, it is an acquaintance, who defrauds the victim. Recently, in the US, large companies such as Sony and Citibank have been hacked and passwords of millions of users stolen. Why hasn’t such an incident happened in India? My take is that hacker-criminals in India are not sophisticated enough as yet. And international criminals haven’t turned their gaze towards India as yet. But the situation could change anytime.

To be frank, not all security holes of Internet banking can be blamed on the banks. Today's Internet infrastructure is full of holes, and still, banks are moving at high speed introducing newer and newer services, without closing the holes that are found.

To give a few examples, most of the home routers come with default passwords, which few users change. As a result, it is not difficult for a hacker to log into them. Wireless networks using WEP are vulnerable to WEP cracking, and software to do so is freely available on the net. And many of Indian payment gateways have security holes.
Banks have to also worry about mobile transactions, which are becoming common.

Vulnerabilities have been found in iphones and other mobiles. Mobiles are increasingly used on wireless hotspots also, and they are particularly vulnerable there. Along with banks, the government also needs to wake up to online security needs.

Recently, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore tied up with a major Chinese company Huawei Technologies, which has funded its center for testing security in telecom systems. It is inconceivable that our government exposes such a critical national security area to a foreign company. The UIDAI, another critical project for national security, is associated with the US companies with dubious credentials.

The government has also failed to act on cyber crime. Until a year ago, Bangalore had not had a single conviction in cyber crime. Having interacted with the cyber crime police, I can vouch for the good job the investigators are doing. However, if the grapevine is to be believed, the reason for the zero rate of conviction seems to be that the powers-that-be have a tough time distinguishing between the IT Act as in the Income Tax Act and the IT Act as in the Information Technology Act.

There are also some bright sides. The two-factor authentication --- requiring a one-time password that is sent on a mobile --- is a much needed improvement that the RBI has mandated for banking transactions. The hacker’s task has got more difficult as he now has to hack the mobile of the victim too along with the desktop computer. However, two-factor authentication is not followed in case of transactions involving share purchase as the time factor is crucial there and one cannot wait for an SMS, which might take minutes or sometimes hours before making the transaction.

What can a lay person do to protect his interest online? While the law favours the user as of now, it is an open question if banks would compensate users in case of a major breach. Thus, it would be surely a good idea for high-value depositors to spread their funds across different banks. ICICI Bank has introduced an insurance policy, which provides a cover of Rs one lakh if money is lost due to fraudulent use of an ATM card. This is a good start.

Secondly, consumer forums should tie up with banks and security companies in educating the users about security of internet banking. After all, however difficult it may look, there is nothing better than taking the bull by the horns.

(Dr Kelekar, a cyber security expert, is managing director of Teknotrends, Bangalore.)