In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 17, 2014

5089 - Aadhaar-LPG fail to link well - Deccan Chronicle


DC | 21st Jan 2014

Hyderabad: Aadhaar-LPG linkage problems have steadily worsened for domestic LPG consumers in AP.

The hasty decision of Oil Marketing Companies to extend the linkage scheme to all districts in the state, ignoring the fact that not even half of the consumers have seeded their LPG connections with Aadhaar and bank accounts so far, is turning out to be a big problem, especially for middle and lower income groups.

Added to their woes, no redressal mechanism exists to resolve issues of consumers with banks, UIDAI, OMCs and gas dealers trying to put the blame on each other for the mess. Many of those who have seeded their Aadhaar numbers with gas agencies and banks are not receiving their subsidy amounts and are ending up paying Rs 1,300 to buy a cylinder against the per-Aadhaar linkage price of Rs 412.50. People of lower income groups have actually started returning cylinders, unable to bear the cost.

In Hyderabad and Ranga Reddy alone, over 9 lakh consumers are losing subsidy due to lack of cards and Aadhaar-LPG linkage issues. “Undelivered cylinders at gas agencies have increased significantly after the introduction of the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme.

On average, 200 cylinders remain undelivered every day under the limits of each gas agency as customers are returning them, unable to pay Rs 1,327 for the LPG. This trend is being witnessed more in the case of consumers from lower income groups,” said Mr D. Ashok Kumar, president, Hyderabad LPG Dealers’ Association.

In Hyderabad, out of the total 13,88,107 domestic LPG connection holders, only 9.73 lakh have seeded their connections with Aadhaar and bank accounts. Thus about 4 lakh consumers have been losing their subsidy amounts since September last year.

Similarly, in Ranga Reddy district, of the total 14,32,159 domestic LPG connection holders, only 9.75 lakh consumers have seeded their connections with Aadhaar and bank accounts and about 4.57 lakh consumers are losing the subsidy amounts in the district.

Ironically, even after seeding LPG connections with Aadhaar and bank accounts, many consumers in the city are not receiving the subsidy amount in their bank accounts after the delivery of the cylinders.

"When we check the linkage status on the OMC’s website, it flashes all 'green' confirming that the linkage was done successfully. I have not been receiving the subsidy amount since September last year though the website clearly shows that the linkage was done.

I utilised three cylinders and ended up paying from Rs 1,000 to Rs 1,300 till now for each cylinder. When I enquired with the gas agency and banks, they said the problem was with the National Payments Corporation of India, which monitors the online disbursal of subsidy amount. They said my data had not been updated with it. Why should I suffer for the mistakes committed by the officials though I have done everything correctly on time?" asked Mr P. Sundar Raj, an LPG consumer from Secunderabad.

There have also been cases where subsidies have been promptly paid for the first two cylinders but has been delayed from the third cylinder onwards.

"I received the subsidy amount promptly for the first two cylinders. I thought the new system was effective and consumer-friendly. Then the problems started for me. I am not getting the subsidy amount from the third cylinder. I received the fifth cylinder last week and am awaiting subsidy for the previous three cylinders.

How can the system be so faulty? Officials and gas agencies are not in a position to clarify whether it was due to a technical glitch or any other reason," said Ms D. Hemalatha, an LPG consumer from  Musheerabad.

Next: Not enough banks in rural areas to credit subsidy