In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, February 28, 2014

5230 - As Nandan Nilekani packs up for active politics, there are questions about Aadhaar


As Nandan Nilekani packs up for active politics, there are questions about Aadhaar

Pradyot Lal
Veteran Journalist
Last Updated : 22 Feb 2014 01:56:40 PM IST

As Nandan Nilekani packs up for active politics, there are questions about Aadhaar (File Photo)

Another good man is on the verge of being lost to politics. And as it must be happening with every individual who becomes synonymous with what he is doing, the prospect of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) chairman Nandan Nilekani quitting his job by March end to join mainstream politics and contest the Lok Sabha election on a Congress ticket, has led to a lot of questions.

There are many who may wonder if his absence at the helm would derail the Aadhaar project, vital for slashing India’s subsidy expenditure and increasing the efficacy of welfare programmes.

It was largely Nilekani's model of third-party collection of biometric data which has helped UIDAI to so far issue Aadhaar numbers to 58.7 crore people. The projected target in another year is 90 crore.

Nilekani in all likelihood will contest from the Bangalore South constituency, standing against the BJP’s Ananth Kumar, who has won five Lok Sabha polls consecutively from there. Though a political novice, Nilekani has an impressive track record of a corporate career followed by several years of public service. “ I do not plan to lose” he quipped when he was queried at a news conference.

Over the last five years, Aadhhar has become crucial in many respects.The government relies on it to target oil and fertiliser subsidies better so that the aim of reducing subsidy spending to 1.6 per cent of GDP in three years from 2.2 per cent this fiscal is realised. Also, the outcome of the Centre's welfare spending through flagship schemes on employment, education and health is expected to be enhanced thanks to Aadhaar.

“There are issues like how to improve water supply. Education is a big challenge for children, and jobs also,” Nilekani said of the prospects ahead. Nilekani, 58, has already been running an “Idea for Bangalore” on his official Facebook page, talking about issues such as transportation, infrastructure and environment in the city. He added that the UIDAI is now in a position where anybody can take it forward from this point. 

Nilekani's stint in the government has however not been without trouble. Reports have periodically disclosed how the Aadhaar project faced stiff resistance not just from the Opposition parties but also from senior Congress leaders who resented the growing stature of the IITian in the party.

Besides the ministries of food and home, which had a turf war with the role of the UID authority (Census of India had wanted sole rights to issue biometrics), the finance ministry, which had backed most UIDAI decisions, too rejected its demand to increase its biometric capture mandate from 200 million to all 1.2 billion.

Despite these odds, Aadhaar-based direct benefit transfers have touched close to Rs 2,600 crore in 292 districts of the country.

Nilekani, for all that he achieved, was not able to get the National Identification Authority of India Bill which would have provided statutory status to the UIDAI, which issues Aadhaar numbers to residents. Further, in another setback to the Nilakani-led authority, the government has delinked Aadhaar from disbursal of subsidised LPG cylinders, which can now be purchased without an Aadhaar account. The direct benefits transfer on liquefied petroleum gas (DBTL) was put on hold citing ground-level implementation issues last week.

Under DBT, about 4.86 crore accounts have been made and around 2.06 crore households have received subsidised cylinders.

While the DBT related to ministries of justice and empowerment, human resource development, minority affairs, women and child development, health and family and labour and employment began from January last year, the subsidy on food, fertilisers and petroleum products to the poor by directly transferring cash to their bank accounts using Aadhaar got delayed due to the massive scale and complexity of these major subsidy schemes.

The home ministry questioned the accuracy of the UIDAI data, effectively sending out the message that its own entity that does the census will collect biometrics and its overlap with the National Population Register which has a similar task of collecting data. However, the biggest setback for the UIDAI programme was dealt by the Supreme Court interim ruling saying that Aadhaar was voluntary and its use could not be mandated by any government agency in order to provide services to citizens.

He says that irrespective of the electoral outcome, he chose the political path because a lot of changes are required in the system.

The UIDAI was formed in 2009 and aimed at generating 60 crore Aadhaar accounts by 2014. Nilekani was appointed as chairman in July 2009 with the rank and status of a Cabinet minister for an initial tenure of five years.

“Recently, the government also gave us mandate to go to four more states — Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand, which have a total population of 33 crore. So we will build a system now which can do 30 crore a year. So I think with the momentum continuing, we are looking at enrolments of up to 90 crore by sometime in 2015,” Nilekani added.

He disclosed that it has not yet been decided by the Election Commission whether Aadhaar cards will be used for voting purposes.