In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 24, 2014

5154 - Ahead of cabinet meet, parliamentary panel had scrapped Aadhaar-based DBT regime for LPG

By Vikas Dhoot, ET Bureau | 3 Feb, 2014, 04.12AM IST

NEW DELHI: Two days before the Cabinet put the Aadhaar-based direct benefits transfer regime for LPG cylinders on hold, a parliamentary panel led by a Congress MP had put the government in the dock for the inconveniences the scheme was causing to the poor. 

The Estimates Committee chaired by South Goa MP Francisco Sardinha had almost unanimously called for scrapping the direct benefits transfer scheme for LPG cylinders at its meeting on January 27. 

This was the second time in a week that the committee was reviewing the scheme with petroleum and natural gas ministry officials. "We had been receiving a lot of complaints from people since the DBT scheme for LPG started. Even for the poor with Aadhaar numbers, the DBT scheme required them to pay the full price for a cylinder first and then wait for the subsidy to reach their bank accounts. The poor simply can't afford this," Estimates Committee chairman Francisco Sardinha told ET. 

The estimates committee is mandated to suggest alternative policies for improving administrative efficiencies while reviewing departments' financial estimates, but is also empowered to examine matters of special interest which may arise in the course of its work. Though Sardinha didn't share details of the Estimates panel's deliberations, two other MPs confirmed that Congress as well as Opposition party MPs were in favour of scrapping the DBT scheme for LPG cylinders. 

The criticism of the DBT scheme was echoed by several ministers including Defence Minister AK Antony and Food minister KV Thomas at the meeting of the Cabinet Committee of Political Affairs (CCPA) on January 30, where the annual quota of subsidized LPG cylinders was raised from nine to twelve per household and the Aadhar linkage was suspended. The ministers had flagged the same concern as the Estimates Panel chief that it is difficult for the poor to fork out the full price of a cylinder upfront and wait for the subsidy, when the matter was debated over a two and a half hour meeting of the CCPA. 

The Cabinet Committee on the Unique Identification programme, under which Aadhaar numbers are being allotted to people on the basis of their biometric details, was also slated to meet on Thursday to consider a proposal by the Nandan Nilekani-led Unique Identification Authority of India or UIDAI to begin enrollments in the Hindi heartland states of UP, Bihar, Chhatisgarh and Uttarakhand in order to expedite the rollout of DBTs ahead of the Lok Sabha polls. 

However, after the CCPA's decision to put the DBT scheme for LPG cylinders — the biggest end-use of the Aadhaar platform so far — on hold, the meeting of the cabinet panel on UID was deferred. 

 The Prime Minister-led panel is now scheduled to meet on February 4 to consider UIDAI's proposal, though the CCPA's decision has blunted its arguments to some extent. 

The UIDAI has proposed to start enrollments in these four states, citing the slow pace of enrollments in these states for the National Population Register, a resident identification programme being operated by the Census Commissioner's office under the home ministry. 

As per an earlier cabinet decision, states were divided between the UIDAI and NPR for biometric enrollment purposes and the Hindi heartland states were allotted to the home ministry. 

When the CCUID meets on February 4, the finance ministry may express reservations about duplication of expenditure on enrollment in these states and the home ministry is expected to point out that it has already signed contracts with service providers to conduct the enrollment exercise. While Nilekani was unavailable for comment, a senior government official close to the UIDAI dismissed speculation that the authority's proposal is weakened in light of the CCPA decision. "Aadhaar is a platform for multiple applications. 

Direct Benefits Transfer for LPG cylinders is just one of those applications," the official said. Apart from the PM, four members in the cabinet's UID panel are also part of the CCPA, which decided to appoint a committee to suggest how to take the DBT scheme for LPG cylinders forward - NCP supremo Sharad Pawar, Finance Minister P Chidambaram, law and telecom minister Kapil Sibal and Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde. 

The panel also includes rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, with Nilekani and Planning Commission deputy chairperson Montek Singh Ahluwalia as special invitees. Sardinha welcomed the cabinet's decision to raise the number of subsidized cylinders and revert to the old system of subsidising oil marketing companies. 

"Almost every MP present at the meeting was stridently critical of the scheme, citing the experiences from their own constituencies. We also questioned the ministry about the basis on which six and nine cylinders were considered enough for poor households, without factoring in the number of members in a family," said another Congress MP who is a member of the Estimates Committee, requesting anonymity. "People living as joint families have had to split their ration cards in order to get enough LPG cylinders. 

Ministry officials claimed that their research showed that no poor family consumed more than nine cylinders a year, but a few MPs countered by asking if they had also studied how much firewood was used," said the second MP

.