In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 24, 2014

5167 - Don’t kill the Aadhaar - Financial Express


Santosh Tiwari | Updated: Feb 04 2014, 03:27 IST

SUMMARY
Its huge database of 57-crore-plus people and growing is a reforms treasure

The government’s move to pull the plug on its much-hyped direct benefit transfer (DBT) in disbursing LPG subsidy may throw the whole Aadhaar programme out of gear if corrective steps are not taken immediately to keep the ball rolling. It has gained proportions which can only be utilised and not discounted at any cost.

The total number of Aadhaars issued flashing on the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) portal at the time of writing this column was 57,75,30,807. At the current pace, the number should cross 60 crore within no time. This means about half the population in the country will be having Aadhaar soon, making them traceable through biometric identification. Of the total number of Aadhaars issued, 30.46% have been taken by individuals aged between 16 and 30, 24.45% by individuals between 31 and 45, 18.67% by those between 6 and 15, 18.32% by those between 46 and 65, 4.45% by those aged 66 years and above, and 3.65% by those below 5 years.
In terms of state-wise penetration, the maximum number of Aadhaars (8.22 crore) have been issued in Maharashtra; followed by Andhra Pradesh’s 7.87 crore, and Tamil Nadu with 4.37 crore, Madhya Pradesh (4.2 crore), Karnataka (4.13 crore), Rajasthan (3.8 crore), West Bengal (3.42 crore), Kerala (3 crore), Gujarat and Jharkhand (close to 2.6 crore each in both states), Uttar Pradesh and Punjab (2.34 crore each), Orissa and Haryana (1.8 crore each), and Delhi (1.66 crore).

The short point is Aadhaar can’t be ignored any more—it is a huge database which needs to keep growing till there is 100% coverage, and be utilised by the agencies across the country, both central and state-level. Be it linking of Aadhaar with permanent account numbers (PAN) to curb tax evasion, or its linkage to the National Food Security scheme to minimise leakages in the subsidy disbursal, or with land records in the states, the applications are countless to capitalise.

And now there is no doubt that the Aadhaar-based payment system through biometric identification works, and works well. The DBT in LPG distribution has proved beyond doubt that large number of transactions can be done successfully through this mode.

The petroleum ministry itself claimed on December 30: “The Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG (DBTL) scheme thus far has been a stupendous success with more than 40 million cash transfers to the consumer’s bank accounts. A total sum of over Rs 2,000 crore has been transferred in these districts providing direct benefits in the hands of the consumers.”

Considering the scheme was launched on June 1, 2013, its spread has been fast and in complete contrast with the DBT scheme’s performance in other areas like scholarship or pension disbursement, where it was launched on January 1, 2013. 

Obviously, the differentiating factor has been the fact that DBT in LPG is predominantly handled by the oil marketing companies but DBTs in other areas are being handled by different ministries and departments, and the states too have played their bit in keeping the pace slow. There is no denying the fact that stalling DBT in LPG is a massively retrograde step by the UPA government, after it took the scheme so far.

When oil minister M Veerappa Moily announced the government decision to put on hold DBT in LPG through the Aadhaar-based system last week, it was already running in 291 high Aadhaar-coverage districts, covering 9.5 crore customers out of a total of about 15 crore, throughout the country.

The scheme aims to curb leakages and prevent black-marketing and provide subsidy to consumers in their bank accounts. “In these 184 districts, the subsidy on LPG cylinders is being provided directly to the consumers in their Aadhaar-linked bank accounts,” the ministry had claimed in December. All that has been forgotten now and a panel will decide on the future of DBT in LPG. In effect, it is highly unlikely that the scheme will be restarted before the next general elections due in April-May—the new government will take a call on whether this should be done or not.

In the meantime, though, what the government should do at least is to continue with the process of seeding of Aadhaar with the bank accounts and LPG consumers’ data. This will save the scheme from getting completely derailed. As the problem lies in implementation, there have been complaints that it is difficult for many to first pay the non-subsidised price of the LPG and then wait for getting the subsidised amount in their bank accounts, once a solution is found to tackle this issue, the whole scheme can then be re-initiated again.

The other indication the government needs to give as quickly as possible is that the de-linking of Aadhaar with LPG subsidies will in no way impact the enrolment process for the unique identity number. On an average, over 3 crore Aadhaars have been issued every month in the last four months—the highest being 3.32 crore in October 2013.

A good idea, therefore, would be to allow UIDAI now to expedite Aadhaar enrolments in states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand, where it has been slow—this is being done in these states under the home ministry’s National Population Register (NPR) programme. The move will allow the UIDAI to keep the momentum going.

santosh.tiwari@expressindia.com