In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, February 27, 2014

5210 - Why suspending DBT scheme would be a retrograde step - DBT- Economic Times


Feb 19, 2014, 04.13AM IST
By A P Hota

Reportedly, the government of India is planning to suspend the Scheme of Direct Cash Transfer of LPG Subsidy through Aadhaar. This has raised a counter question: why such a great idea implemented with rigour and discipline unparalleled in recent years is being suspended all of a sudden.

The scheme referred to as Direct Benefit Transfer of LPG Subsidy (DBTL) is innovative in many ways. The scheme provided the hope that the Aadhaar number would be leveraged for cash transfer of subsidy only to the intended beneficiaries and would plug leakages.

It was also hoped that diversion of subsidised cylinders for commercial use would be prevented and bring greater transparency in subsidy management.

Despite apprehensions, the scheme could be rolled out in such a large area covering 291 districts within a short duration of eight months. Therefore, any plan to suspend the scheme would not only be a retrograde step, but would raise a question as to whether the objectives of the scheme have been appreciated fully.

National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) plays a key role in the operation of the scheme. The initial operational problems and apprehensions have been addressed to a great extent. The scheme has been extended only in those districts where Aadhaar enrolment is more than 80%.

The LPG customer is required to 'link' the Aadhaar number with the LPG distributor and also 'seed' with the bank. The bank, in turn, will report the fact of seeding the Aadhaar number to NPCI for 'mapping' in the 'Aadhaar Mapper'. Once these three small processes are completed, the consumer is ready to receive the subsidy through 'Aadhaar Payment Bridge (APB)' of NPCI in an automated manner.

When a district is taken up for DBTL, the consumer has to request for linking and seeding to his gas distributor and his bank respectively.

The impression that linking and seeding are difficult processes is no longer valid. The very fact that 60 million records in the Aadhaar Mapper have been mapped during such a short period indicates that the initial learning difficulties have been overcome. The oil marketing companies have trained their distributors and staff as to how the Aadhaar number of the consumer should be linked in their system.

Similarly, banks have simplified the processes for seeding the Aadhaar number in their core banking solution. Apart from their branches, they have enabled alternative channels like internet banking, ATMs and IVR for accepting the requests of customers for seeding purposes.

Similarly, banks have been provided access to NPCI's Aadhaar Mapper for uploading the seeded data to the Mapper in an automated way without any manual intervention.

Banks can now check the status of Aadhaar mapping seamlessly. Recently, NPCI launched a web service for the LPG consumers whereby a customer can log on to the transparency portal of the oil marketing company and check the status of linking, seeding and mapping. A customer with MTNL or BSNL mobile connection can also make a query by raising a USSD query to *99#. This service called 'Query Service on Aadhaar Mapper (QSAM)' has been a success.

The DBTL scheme demands that when LPG cylinder is delivered, the consumer is charged the full commercial rate of the cylinder. As against the old system of receiving the cylinder at .`400+, the consumer is now charged .`1,100+ in the DBTL scheme. This gives a visibility of the cost of the cylinder. On the third day, the consumer's account gets credited with the subsidy component (the difference between the earlier rate and the new commercial rate).

Thus, the subsidy is now made available by way of cash instead of kind. This is no doubt a point of discomfort to the consumer. But there seems to be no easy way of preventing commercial consumers camouflaging as household consumers and defeating the purpose of subsidy.

Last month, NPCI processed 15 million DBTL transactions apart from State Bank of India which processed another 5 million transactions.

Thus, subsidy payment was made only to 20 million consumers thereby plugging the leakage in a big way. Since the launch of DBTL scheme in June 2013, it has achieved a success rate of over 99.50% credit to the intended beneficiaries on the third day. Even at the back of this success, if the scheme is suspended because of some teething trouble, the efforts required to revive the scheme would be difficult.

It would be better to fine-tune the scheme as it moves instead of taking a halt. One such fine-tuning can be to ensure making the payment on the very day instead of on the third day. It is possible to streamline and make the payment even real time.
Payment systems in India have come of age with NPCI's Immediate Payment Service (IMPS) and National Automated Clearing House (NACH) service and DBTL scheme should leverage the same. Suspending the scheme should be the last thing to consider.

Writer is the MD & CEO, National Payments Corp of India