In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 24, 2014

5151 - Delink from LPG subsidy not end of Aadhaar: UIDAI - GOVERNANCE NOW

Getting LPG subsidy not the reason people got enrolled for Aadhaar in first three years, says UIDAI deputy D-G


PRATAP VIKRAM SINGH | NEW DELHI | JANUARY 31 2014

With general elections merely weeks away, the UPA government has revised the cap on cooking gas cylinders to 12 and put on hold the direct benefit transfer (to bank account of beneficiaries) for LPG cylinders, fearing a backlash from a section of population that could have been deprived of fuel subsidy for lacking the Aadhaar number or bank account.

Touted as a game-changer, direct benefit transfer (or DBT) was expected to be a winning formula for the coming elections by the Congress. But the government’s decision now will freeze a mammoth exercise undertaken by the oil marketing companies (OMCs), distributors and banks to transfer the subsidy directly in consumer's account.

This comes weeks after supreme court made Aadhaar optional in an interim order in September 2013.  Earlier, the government had decided to provide direct cash subsidy on food, fertiliser and fuel, which accounted for most of the Rs 2.5 lakh crore annual subsidy.

But AP Singh, deputy director general of UIDAI, said the linkage of Aadhaar with service delivery required a change in processes and use of information technology – something that can’t happen overnight.

Defending the Aadhaar programme, he said DBTL (or DBT for LPG subsidy) was introduced only last year – nearly three years after UIDAI became functional. “That (getting LPG subsidy) is not the reason people got enrolled (for Aadhaar) in the first three years,” Singh said. “Our USP remains cleaning the beneficiary database and providing identity authentication services. Aadhaar is still being used for cleaning the database of LPG consumers to ensure that a consumer doesn’t have multiple connections.

“Aadhaar is still being used as a proof of identity if one wants an LPG cylinder."

He said as of now 120 government and private organisations are using Aadhaar authentication services. The government users include agencies responsible for distribution of social security and scholarship payments. The private agencies belong to telecom, insurance, banks, m-commerce and e-commerce verticals.

DBT concern in ruling party
Senior Congress leaders who had slight apprehensions about risks involved in the DBT rollout, which could have left out of its ambit a substantial section of the population that is yet to enroll for Aadhaar or get a bank account, had struck down the cash transfer option related to food and fertiliser.

The decision comes as relief to citizens who were put under pressure by OMCs to submit their Aadhaar number to LPG distributor and the bank to avail the subsidy. The other option would have left a huge hole in most pockets – buying the cylinder after paying the market price (Rs 1,240; could vary in some states) against the subsidised rate of Rs 451.

Consumers, including those already getting subsidy payments in their accounts, will get the LPG cylinders in the old fashion, information and broadcasting minister Manish Tiwari told the media after Thursday’s cabinet meeting.

A senior UIDAI official told Governance Now that till December 2013, the petroleum ministry had transferred Rs 2,800 crore subsidy to 1.9 crore consumers of LPG cylinder in 289 districts. This amounted to 4 crore DBTL (DBT for LPG) transactions; 1 crore transactions were recorded in December itself, the official said.

Consumers were being paid a subsidy amount of Rs 435, which was transferred in the bank accounts.
While the decision to delink subsidy for LPG cylinders from DBT is seen as a severe blow to the Aadhaar-enabled service delivery model, the UIDAI believes that DBT is just one of many applications of Aadhaar, and its key USP remains providing identity authentication services, which are being used by many government and private sector agencies.

On average, UIDAI receives 1 lakh authentication requests from these agencies every day, UIDAI’s Singh said. “The authority has the capacity to process 10 crore authentication requests per day and even this capacity could be scaled up further whenever required,” he said.
LPG
The authentication services have recorded a 96 percent success rate, and the target is to achieve 99.59 percent, Singh said.
Confident about the future of Aadhaar programme post-elections, Singh said going by petroleum ministry’s own estimate, countrywide rollout of DBTL could lead to a saving of Rs 12,000 crore. “I don’t think any government will be averse to reducing such leakages in the service delivery system,” Singh said.