In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, January 23, 2011

1055-Father struggles to get NREGA Wages, son dies in hospital - TOI

Supriya Sharma, TNN, Jan 21, 2011, 10.04pm IST

RAIPUR: A week after he lost his ailing son, and ten months after he worked on a village road project, Pitbasu Bhoi finally got the ten thousand rupees he had earned under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Program (MNREGA).

"Of what use is the money now? I have just immersed my son's ashes. When I needed the money to save his life, I did not have it," says Bhoi.

The disabled man, in his forties, along with his wife, had put in 100 days of work last year under the rural job guarantee program to dig earth and build a road in village Pampapur in Chhattisgarh's Sarguja district.

Bhoi began work in February 2010. According to provisions under MNREGA, workers should be paid within 15 days of work. But ten months later, in the second week of January, as his 22 year old son Santosh struggled for life in a hospital, suffering from a serious kidney ailment, Bhoi was still limping around to collect his wages.

"My son had been complaining of pain for a few weeks, but since we did not have the money, we delayed taking him to the hospital. Finally when the pain became unbearable, we travelled 30 kilometres to Ambikapur town. After admitting him there, I travelled back and forth between the hospital and the block panchayat everyday, trying to get my money," said Bhoi.

But he did not get the money, and five days after he was hospitalised, his son Santosh died. As reports appeared in local newspapers, local officials visited the village, and on Thursday, the branch of the rural public sector bank handed Bhoi ten thousand rupees.

"The death is unfortunate, but it cannot be connected to the delayed payment of wages," said Dhananjay Dewangan, chief executive officer of the zilla panchayat. He claimed the wages had been released by the administration a few weeks ago, but could not explain why Bhoi did not get the money from the bank on time.

"This is just one case. In Pampapur village alone, there are 58 workers who have not receievd their wages for several months," said Manish Rai, a local activist of Gram Adhikar Manch.

Activists identify the problem of delay in payments of wages as the "the single biggest challenge" facing NREGA in Chhattisgarh.

In October 2010, a survey by Right to Food groups revealed that 68% of workers got their wages later than a month. The survey covering 43 blocks in 17 districts, randomly selecting 10 workers in each panchayat, interviewing a total of 1620 workers, found a glaring mismatch between the data on the NREGA website and what the workers had actually recieved.

For instance, in Sarguja, the NREGA website claimed 100% of workers had been paid within a month, but during the survey, 61 percent of the workers said they had not been received their payments.

"The monitoring system is very weak. Wage data is entered incorrectly. District collectors do not know the true extent of the payment delay," said Sameer Garg, advisor to Commissioner of Supreme Court for food security. "If the problem is not correctly monitored and recognised, how will it be solved?"

The survey report concludes rather bleakly: "uncertainty regarding wage payments results in the poorest opting out of NREGS work and even migrating". Activists fear this could defeat the very purpose of the program launched in 2005 to act as a safety net for vulnerable rural poor.