In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, January 29, 2011

1075 - Beware of gullible politicos tinkering with data privacy

 Friday, January 28, 2011

KARLIN LILLINGTON

Today is international data privacy day, and It’s a shame we do so little to mark the event

WITH THE Seanad passing the data retention – oops, communications – Bill without amendment last week, and Data Protection Commissioner Billy Hawkes warning political parties on Monday that they are not to illegally use (again, for some) unsolicited text messages, calls or emails in the looming election, how ironically appropriate that today is International Data Privacy and Data Protection Day.

We sure need it. Our own knowledge of the issues and implications around data privacy remains shockingly low. What else explains the ill-informed speeches of Senators and TDs welcoming data retention – the storage of transmission data about every one of our phone calls, e-mails and some internet use – as an aid for criminal investigations even as they wave in longer retention periods for Ireland than almost any other country?

Along with creating a more unwelcoming business environment for exactly the internet and technology “knowledge industries” the state supposedly wishes to attract, our new data retention legislation goes against all evidence that shows that police do not need data for investigations held longer than the six months advocated by Europe’s Data Protection Commissioners. Not for one to two years (as under the new proposals), not for three years (as was the case before).

Read that again: not one court case the politicos will cite during their speeches about why we need data retention made use of, or required, a single piece of data retained for longer than six months.

Meanwhile, as so few restrictions apply to the Garda in requesting retained data, tens of thousands of requests have been made for records. We do need legislation to protect data from wholesale trawling – but that does not mean we also need to continue to store it for longer than is recommended or than most of our European partners hold it for.

But our pending legislation ignores that the very concept of long-term data retention is under serious threat now in several EU countries including Germany. Our own poorly drafted, existing data retention legislation has been referred to the European Court of Justice for consideration on the very grounds of whether storing data on an entire population before any one of it has committed a crime – just on the possibility that someone might – is grossly disproportionate.

So we certainly have much to consider today. It’s a shame then that we seem to do so little with a day that has become an annual fixture elsewhere, with many events happening across the US and Europe. Not so much in Ireland, which is a lost opportunity for teachers in particular.

Many schools and universities internationally do awareness- raising activities with students around the subject, including debates on the subject of privacy and workshops on options for protecting your data online.

This is critical knowledge needed by new generations growing up having known nothing else but mobile phones, social media profiles, and public photo and video sites. And given that the default settings on Facebook, which more rather than less of us now use, still share your data and images with friends of friends, education in the area of privacy and data protection is crucial for all of us.

But it isn’t just students – many citizens say they feel powerless when they deal with social services and are asked for information that they do not need to hand over. This can be especially the case with the more vulnerable in society – homeless people, or the elderly; people less sure of what authorities are allowed to ask.

Would you know yourself? Most of us would not. And as the government prepares to bring in a universal identity card which would give access to so much of our most personal data, we need to understand what we may be trading away in the name of bureaucratic convenience.

There has been no public debate at all on whether citizens should have to carry ID cards much less cards connected to our health and social welfare information, the kind of card widely opposed by privacy advocates worldwide.

There are some easy ways to learn more about your personal and business rights to privacy – and if a business, obligations towards data protection.

For individuals, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties produces a range of free brochures on a variety of topics, one of which is called Protect Your Privacy.

This offers an excellent, easy to understand overview and list of resources and can be viewed online, downloaded from their website or obtained from their offices. You can find it at: tinyurl.com/6l6xt5d.

The Data Protection Commissioner’s website, dataprotection.ie, also has a wealth of information for businesses and citizens. The menu on the left-hand-side of the site offers a link for individuals or organisations, depending on what a visitor is looking for.

The website for European Privacy Day, europeanprivacyday. org, offers a booklet for this year’s event that summarises some of the key issues and provides a handy overview.

These are going to be topics that only become more pressing as we become ever more technologically intermeshed. In particular, we need to watch what our politicians are doing as it is clear they have a very low level of knowledge about data retention – much less data protection.