In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

2460 - The e-payment transformation - Live Mint



With the abundance of technological solutions available, it is prudent that in public interest, the government and RBI devise means to move to a less-cash economy
Ashish Das

In his budget speech, the finance minister said that by using the Aadhaar platform for direct transfer of subsidy into the bank accounts of beneficiaries, substantial economies in subsidy outgo can be achieved.

As the Aadhaar platform is now ready to support e-payments directly to the beneficiary accounts for several state-sponsored schemes, the government is proposing to increase Aadhaar enrolments. Such initiatives by the government to promote electronic payments will not only benefit the country to check leakages but also reduce cash in the economy by promoting e-payments.

What should be the country’s model to move away from cash and cheques? For devising an appropriate model, one should first understand the business model behind cash and cheques in the payment system of the economy.

Today, in a cash transaction at a bank, it apparently appears that receiving and giving cash (and, similarly, cheque) is free for a customer. However, the expenditures towards such transactions in a bank, to a great extent, are borne by the bank, which, in turn, passes them on to their customers in the form of lower returns on the deposits held by the bank (no interest offered on current accounts and about 4% rate of interest for savings accounts).

On the other hand, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which has the mandate of currency management, spends a considerable amount of its revenue in managing cash in the country (printing and distribution, storage, management, accounting, etc.).

The expenditure towards this cash management reduces the balances that are transferred by RBI to the government’s kitty. Similarly, the government also spends money (out of its revenue) to manage cash payments and receipts through its various departments, social programmes, etc.

The other significant drawbacks of cash:
(i) A cash economy reduces the reserve base of the banking system. Stock of currency held outside of the banking system constitutes a potential source of unproductive economic resource because these cash stores are not available for credit expansion—thereby impeding monetary growth.
(ii) Cash-use reduces accountability. A predominance of cash in retail sales leads to a deterioration in business accountability as transaction tracking is not possible; it enables tax leakage, diminishes financial inclusion and enables the existence of a parallel economy.

If we look deeply, the whole gambit of the expenditures involved in a cash-based economy is actually being funded by the citizens of India through the direct and the indirect taxes they pay to the government.
According to a recent report of the Nandan Nilekani task force, it is estimated that the cost of cash to an economy is 5-7% of gross domestic product (GDP), which, for India (at current level of GDP), amounts to more than Rs. 5 trillion

This can be reduced considerably through the use of existing electronic payments.
With the abundance of technological solutions available, it is prudent that in public interest, the government and RBI devise means to move to a less-cash economy.

This will not only be less expensive for the country but will also increase the traceability and accountability of payments, thereby, reducing the problems of bribery, corruption, and black money.

The government, thus, should not only promote systems and procedures that facilitate the migration away from cash, but also bring in explicit awareness among its people, highlighting the advantages to the country and its people, in such a migration. This migration will save considerable revenue of the government that can be channelized into other developmental programmes.

Although the government is trying to scale up Aadhaar-enabled e-payments in at least 50 selected districts within six months, one needs to ensure there are avenues available to such beneficiaries to use their bank balances digitally, thereby, minimizing the need of complete cash withdrawal (at bank branches or business correspondent outlets) once the benefits and subsidy money reaches the bank accounts.

Ashish Das is professor, IIT Bombay