In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, March 29, 2012

2479 - Plan panel nod to RIC may reopen home ministry-UIDAI battle - Live Mint

Plan panel nod to RIC may reopen home ministry-UIDAI battle

Posted: Wed, Mar 28 2012. 11:15 PM IST



The panel also recommended that RICs carry the Aadhaar number, said a govt official

Sahil Makkar 


New Delhi: The Planning Commission’s recommendation that the expenditure finance committee (EFC) approve the home ministry’s resident identity card (RIC) project may have reopened the fight between the home ministry and the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).




A senior government official who didn’t want to be identified claimed that the Planning Commission has also recommended that RICs carry the Aadhaar number, making it unnecessary for UIDAI to send out letters to all enrolls. Mint couldn’t independently ascertain this.

Planning Commission member secretary Sudha Pillai had previously publicly raised issues about UIDAI’s inadequate financial processes only to have these dismissed by Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia.

Last week, Ahluwalia said an appraisal note had been submitted to EFC and that he wasn’t opposed to the RIC project. He said he was unaware of other details.

UIDAI chairman Nandan Nilekani couldn’t be reached for comment.

A senior UIDAI official who didn’t want to be identified said it would oppose any plan that meant not sending out a letter to enrollees. “A letter is completion of our process,” the official said. “In a sense a letter delivered to a resident is a check that he exists. The letter is the final closing piece in Aadhaar cycle and it should go to every resident”

The official added that UIDAI’s other objection has to do with the fact that RICs will only be given to people above the age of 18. “What will happen to people who are below this age?” he asked.

The home ministry, on the one side, and the Planning Commission and UIDAI on the other, had fought a bitter and all-too-public battle over the scope of the Aadhaar project because it overlapped, in some aspects, with the National Population Register project. A compromise was finally reached on 27 January that allowed the scope of UIDAI’s project to be expanded to 600 million and seemingly prevented duplication in the collection of biometric information. The National Population Registry, being put together by the Census department that falls under the home ministry, is to form the basis of the RIC project. Ahluwalia and Nilekani had previously opposed RIC.

The government official cited above said carrying the Aadhaar number on RICs would save the Rs. 22 UIDAI currently spends on sending each letter with the numbers to enrollees.

However, the UIDAI official cited above said the home ministry’s project would take time and is also against the spirit of the country’s information technology (IT) policy. “RIC will be delivered after a fairly prolonged process that could be couple of months or an year from now,” he said. “Also, we raised the point that we should adhere to the national IT policy that says we should move towards the online verification process in future. The RIC process is getting redundant.”

A home ministry official said the RIC despatch system would cost less since it would consolidate all the cards being sent to a family, rather than seek to deliver them individually as with the UID.

The RIC programme was launched in India’s nine coastal states after the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks. The union home ministry is seeking to extend the scheme to the rest of the country and has sought Rs. 6,700 crore to fund the programme. The card uses a chip that carries data, photographs and fingerprints of the holder.

A second home ministry official said off-line verification was more feasible and effective than online methods.

“Not every one is online in the country. There is no uniformity of Internet and mobile services. This problem is worse in the northeast and bordering areas.”

sahil.m@livemint.com