AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 2431 - No decision on Nandan Nilekani as Indian candidate for World Bank chief

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, March 12, 2012

2431 - No decision on Nandan Nilekani as Indian candidate for World Bank chief - Economic Times

12 Mar, 2012, 04.16AM IST,

Soma Banerjee & Vikas Dhoot,

ET Bureau

NEW DELHI: Notwithstanding the chatter in the blogosphere about Nandan Nilekani's possible candidature for World Bank president, the Indian government has not taken any decision in this regard and has so far not sounded out the former Infosys CEO who now heads the country's ambitious unique identity number (UID) project.

Two government officials said no discussions has been held on whether India would be interested in nominating a candidate for the World Bank's top post and added that no names have been mentioned. But foreign minister SM Krishna on Friday said that the Bank's leadership should be decided on merit and mustn't be restricted to American candidates.

A person close to Nilekani said he had not been sounded out and that he wasn't interested in being nominated. "He is more keen to take his pet project of creating the world's biggest electronic delivery platform, to its logical conclusion," said this person.

Nilekani has been the chairman of the Unique Identity Authority of India (UIDAI) since 2009. The authority has been tasked with the responsibility of assigning a unique identity number to every Indian resident, creating an electronic delivery platform that could alter the way the state spends Rs 3,00,000 crore ($60 billion) each year by way of subsidies or wages under programmes such as MGNREGA.

The president of the World Bank has traditionally been an American and the Bank has invited nominations from its 165 shareholder nations by March 23 for a suitable replacement for current incumbent Robert Zoellick whose term ends this June. Among the likely US contenders for the job are Hillary Clinton, Lawrence Summers, Jeffrey Sachs and even Pepsico's Indra Nooyi.

Though some believe that the US would refuse to accept a non-American candidate for the Bank's leadership in an election year, India could have a better negotiating position as it had supported the developed nations' candidate to lead the International Monetary Fund last year, said a senior government official.

Over the past few days, think-tanks such as the US-based Centre for Global Development (CGD) and syndicated columnists have expounded on the credentials of Nilekani to find solutions for the complex global problems of the day.

Calling Nilekani 'India's Bill Gates' CGD president Nancy Birdsall praised his commitment to philanthropy as well as his current efforts to deliver welfare benefits to the poor through biometric technology solutions.

Birdsall and her colleague Arvind Subramanian described Nilekani as a 'highly qualified candidate' to lead the World Bank. The two also suggested another non-American candidate for the job - former Nigerian finance minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

But a senior Bank official in Washington said Nilekani was not considered a serious candidate "rumour mills are working overtime. There is no indication here that Nilekani is a serious candidate," said the official, speaking on conditions of anonymity. Telephone calls to India's representative on the World Bank board, executive director Mukesh Nandan Prasad, did not elicit a response.