In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, March 16, 2012

2441 - Long live Marx, Netaji zindabad! - Rediff


Long live Marx, Netaji zindabad!
March 14, 2012 20:46 IST

A memorandum opposing Aadhaar and other anti-people policies was submitted to the Indian National Congress-led government along with a big truck load of signatures numbering 3.57 crore to mark the 129th death anniversary of Karl Marx, one of most influential socialist thinkers post industrial revolution amidst a huge People's March to Parliament comprising about one lakh citizens on Mach 14 in the national capital. 

The meeting concluding the People's March underlined the need for internationalism and remembered Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, one of foremost anti-imperialist heroes of the world in glowing terms. His death remains unconfirmed since August 18, 1945. 

Marx died in London at the age of 64, two years prior to the formation of Indian National Congress and Communist parties in India, but they claimed that his ideas influenced them. Under the Indian Constitution every political party in the country is registered as a socialist party. If they will profess any other ideology, they will not even be registered. All the national and regional parties take oath to be a socialist party but in a classic case of double speak and hypocrisy they practice against the principles of socialism. 

The meeting of the People's March remembered that during the freedom movement, the leaders of the Indian National Congress backstabbed the revolutionary trend in the interest of capitalism-imperialism by forcing Netaji to resign from the post of the president of the Congress and finally expelling him. 

In his presidential address at the Haripura Congress in 1938 he asserted: If after the capture of political power, national reconstruction takes place on socialistic lines -- as I have no doubt it will -- it is the "have-nots" who will benefit at the expense of the "haves" and the Indian masses have to be classified among the "have-nots". 

Bose was of the view that 'the struggle for Independence has as its aim the removal of the triple bondage of political, economic and social oppression' resonates with views of Marx. 

When world financial crisis struck in 2008, which is still far from over, mainstream media reported 'Booklovers turn to Karl Marx as financial crisis bites in Germany' (15 October 2008, The Guardian) and 'Marx popular amid credit crunch' (20 October 2008, BBC). The question is will the popular perception be accepted that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles"?

In the post World War II era, it is not evident that economical laws determine the course of history, as Marx contended.

Marx along with Friedrich Engels his co-author viewed this law of 'economic determinism' as the creative force in human progress. Engels stated, "The final causes of all social changes and political revolution are to be sought, not in men's brains, not in man's insight into internal truth and justice... but in the economies of each epoch." 

Hasn't the time come to admit, "Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions," as Marx argued?

Both free trade barbarism and wars take birth in the mental landscape. In fact they are conceptual constructs. When war begins in mind, peace must be built there reads motto of UNESCO created in the aftermath of application of nuclear weapons on Japanese cities of Hiroshima, Nagasaki by USA government to kill people and contaminate ecosystem in August 1945. 

In a pithy article titled 'Occupy the Mind: Red Ink For Our Walls!' Slavoj Zizek, a political philosopher and a senior researcher at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia aptly calls for occupation of mind perhaps as a next step to the Occupy Wall Street Movement. Bitter with the experience of how the ideology of Marx has been applied in practice, Zizek, in his book First as Tragedy, Then as Farce argues that "critical leftists have hitherto only succeeded in soiling those in power, whereas the real point is to castrate them . . ." 

One European poet of English origin had long back committed an epistemic sin of having equated war with love by saying "all is fair in love and war". Had he been alive today and taken note of trade wars of last 400 years, he would surely have inferred that 'all is fair in trade' as well. When war is trade-in information, food, water, medicines, natural resources-ecological catastrophe and extinction of plant and animal species is deemed merely collateral damage or 'natural' like market forces. There is something deeply cannibalistic in the protestant ethics of capitalism that creates an illusion that there is anything ethical about unlimited profit at any cost fundamentalism. Following the same an emerging technology regime is attempting to create a convergence economy, People's March alone can give a befitting reply to such sinister efforts underway.   

It is now for the fellow citizens and comrades among movements to devise the next plan of radical action to arrest further collapse in the face of companies with militarised mind that believe in acting might fully rather than rightfully irrespective human suffering. Destruction of ecological space during war and during peace time development both merit urgent attention, the impact appears to be the same. Is development, a war machine in conceptual cloak?   

Emergence of a surveillance state using identification technologies is an expression of a militarised mind of the state, which still carries the residues of imperial propensities, which were opposed by Marx and Bose. It has been opposed even by a parliamentary committee and rejected by the electorate in Uttar Pradesh. 

People's March on the death anniversary of Marx reveals the truthfulness of British writer John Berger's contention "the multitudes have answers to questions which have not yet been posed. The questions are not yet asked because to do so requires words and concepts which ring true, and those currently being used to name events have been rendered meaningless: Democracy, Liberty, Productivity, etc. With new concepts the questions will soon be posed, for history involves precisely such a process of questioning." 

"In applying any theory to practice, you can never rule out geography or history. If you attempt it, you are bound to fail," said Bose. In the aftermath of the demise of socialist governments in USSR and China and in the imminent post capitalist world order, People's March alone holds the key to sane world economy instead of blind Europeanisation or Americanisation. Marx and Bose would not have disagreed.