In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, March 12, 2012

2436 - Aadhaar may ditch India Post - Live Mint

http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/04232714/Aadhaar-may-ditch-India-Post.html

Posted: Sun, Mar 4 2012. 11:27 PM IST

Of the 130 million numbers allotted so far, only around 50 million people have received letters

Surabhi Agarwal

New Delhi: After sparring with the home ministry over biometric data collection and national security concerns, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) has found itself in a new row, this time with the state-owned postal network. The authority says India Post is delaying the delivery of letters informing residents of the unique identity numbers allotted to them under the government’s Aadhaar project.

The upshot is that the authority, led by Infosys Ltd co-founder Nandan Nilekani, is considering handing the job of delivering the letters to private sector firms.



Work in progress: People being enrolled for UID in Tumkur, Karnataka. Photo: Abhijit Bhatlekar/MintWhile UIDAI has allotted Aadhaar identities to 130 million residents, only around 50 million have received letters sent by the authority through India Post informing them about their 12-digit unique identification numbers. The letters have been mailed since the the first set of Aadhaar numbers were issued in September 2010. Some 450,000 letters have been returned to UIDAI.

“The backlog is of 8 crore letters as of now,” Kumar Alok, deputy director general of UIDAI, said in an interview on Wednesday.

“We have been receiving a lot of complaints about the letters not reaching the right people or not reaching at all,” he said. “So we are trying to gauge the interest from private players for this job.”

Although India Post has the widest reach in the country, the state-run postal network hasn’t been able to cope with the pressure, Alok said.

India Post, which comes under the ministry of communications and information technology, was engaged by UIDAI in 2010 to print and deliver letters containing Aadhaar numbers. The postal agency was guaranteed revenue of at least Rs. 400 crore for the delivery of the initial 200 million Aadhaar letters, so its loss will be considerable if the job is taken away from it.

The job of printing the letters has already been taken away from the agency which, according to its website, is the world’s largest postal network with 155,015 post offices as on 31 March 2009. Three private sector firms were given the printing job in January-end after India Post wasn’t able to take the load.

UIDAI, which is implementing one of the key projects of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government, has had its share of rough weather since it was established in 2009. Most recently, in January, the cabinet had to step in to resolve a conflict between the authority and the National Population Register, which is ultimately overseen by the home ministry, over the collection of biometric data.

UIDAI has the mandate of providing unique identities to 600 million people by 2014, enabling them to access the government’s welfare programmes and services such as banking for financial inclusion. For the government it will serve as a tool to better target social spending by making sure that benefits such as subsidies reach the poor.

UIDAI is now exploring the option of roping in private sector express delivery firms to deliver the Aadhaar letters, Alok said.

The authority invited expressions of interest in mid-February from private companies.

“The crisis should be over in the next three to four months,” he said. “We may split the order” between India Post and private companies to clear the backlog and ensure the letters are delivered on time.

An official at India Post acknowledged that there had been several issues with the delivery of Aadhaar letters and conceded the fact that the state network may lose out on the lucrative contract if private sector firms are enlisted for delivering the letters.

“Yes, there have been delays. They are blaming us for it but they are as much to blame,” said the official, who didn’t want to be identified. “There has been a complete lack of planning from their side.”

When it won the contract for printing and delivering the Aadhaar letters, the order was for 2.5 million letters a year, he said. When the printing job was taken away from India Post, there was no backlog and the department was delivering almost one million Aadhaar letters a day, the official said.

“We thought it was a small order but then the work increased tremendously to almost 3-4 crore letters every year,” he said. “We are being misunderstood as a printing press, which we are not.”

The India Post official said it would be “unethical” for UIDAI to split the order in such a way that private firms get to deliver the letters in cities and towns and India Post is retained only for rural areas. Some 90% of its post offices are located in rural areas.

“Our cost of delivering in rural areas is compensated by the profits made in urban areas. If they split the contract, it will be not be fair,” said the official.

Beyond protesting, there isn’t much that India Post can do. “We being a government department can’t take another government department to court but we will surely protest if this happens,” said the official.
surabhi.a@livemint.com