In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, March 12, 2012

2428 - Aadhaar card has little relevance while investing, buying policies - Business Standard

http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/aadhaar-card-has-little-relevance-while-investing-buying-policies/467179/

Neha Pandey Deoras / Mumbai Mar 09, 2012, 00:18 IST

Nagpur-based lecturer Bhagyashree Khote was more than happy to receive her Aadhaar number. She had lost her Permanent Account Number (PAN card) some time before and had to make an investment at the earliest to avail of deductions under Section 80C.

However, Khote was asked to produce additional documents like driving licence or passport if she wanted to invest more than Rs 5,000. Unfortunately, she had neither. “When I had enquired over the phone, the mutual fund advisor had agreed to accept Aadhaar. But, later he backed out,” she narrates.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) allows investing in mutual funds without a PAN but only up to Rs 50,000 per year through the Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) route. Investments per month should be less than Rs 5,000.

When contacted, two mutual fund advisors and stock brokers said they accept the Aadhaar card only as a photo identity document. “Irrespective of the amount, we ask for another address proof and birth proof to be sure about the customer, as fund houses demand it and Sebi is also very stringent these days,” said a Mumbai-based mutual fund advisor.

Khote is not an isolated case. Former member of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) Sukumar Mukhopadhyay told Business Standard, “The card is a proof of identity and not of citizenship. It has only my year of birth. Thus, it will not serve as proof of my birth date, which could have easily been added, since I had mentioned it in the enrolment form. So, for this purpose, I would have to continue relying on my passport.”

Aadhaar is a 12-digit identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) on behalf of the Government of India. It displays an individual’s full name, gender, year of birth, photograph and full address.

The card states that it will help avail government and non-government services. But, this will require each organisation to separately notify that it accepts Aadhar, say experts. It is not clear if banks will accept the card for opening accounts. An official from a private sector bank says, “Not all banking services can be provided on the basis of Aadhaar though RBI has agreed to it. As of now, we are allowing only no-frills services on it and that, too, to those who cannot provide any other valid document.” Agrees a foreign banker, adding more clarity is required.

It gets worse when you approach an insurance company, as the card doesn’t mention your date of birth. “The card can help us determine your approximate age but it poses a loss for us if you are on the higher side of an age block. For instance, say, you were born in 1982, which means you should turn 30 this year. But how do I determine if you have turned 30 or not. Pricing such policies becomes difficult,” says the chief executive of a private life insurance company. Hence, they prefer PAN. But, if you are shopping for a smaller cover (Rs 1 lakh and less), you may find takers for Aadhaar.

Aadhaar cannot be an alternative to PAN. It does not serve any extra purpose and those who have a PAN card can do without it.

R S Sharma, director general of UIDAI, says Aadhaar has little relevance for individuals who have all essential documents like PAN. It is primarily for those who do not have any of the important documents. However, if you’ve been transferred to a new city, you will find it easy to get LPG and telephone connections using Aadhaar.
But, some are very positive about Aadhaar and its utility, going forward. Explains Ashvin Parekh, partner & national leader - global financial services of Ernst & Young, “PAN had taken a long time to find a foothold in India. I feel Aadhaar will also see a similar, slow acceptance and will go a long way in the future.”