In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 5, 2011

1575 - No substitute for PDS - The Hindu

September 4, 201
KUBER NAG

In the rural and ‘backward' districts of Orissa, where starvation is still a real threat, the people prefer PDS to the proposed cash transfers… KUBER NAG

 Lifeline: PDS is not perfect but it works... 
Photo: Reetika Khera

T he Public Distribution System (PDS) is a great idea. If you go into the countryside and talk to people, you can understand the real value of the PDS. This is what I learnt by taking part in a recent survey of the PDS in Orissa, in June 2011. We went to two backward districts: Nuapada (which comes under the “KBK” region) and Sundergarh (with a large tribal population). As we were studying the PDS and asking people what they would feel about getting cash transfers instead, I learnt a lot not only about the PDS but also about the rural society and how poor people live. I started seeing many things with the eyes of an insider, not an outsider; things like poverty, starvation, unemployment, corruption, and so on. In a backward district like Nuapada, you can still meet families who face the threat of starvation death because of a shortage of food.

Imperfect but works

If people are still exposed to starvation in spite of the PDS, how can they trust a system of cash transfers? In Nuapada and Sundergarh, we got an idea of how the PDS works, and felt it was quite successful. Of course there are problems, like unfair distribution of BPL (Below Poverty Line) cards. But still, people prefer the PDS to the idea of cash transfers.

When we were asking people about their views on the PDS and cash transfers, we got a lot of interesting feedback. Almost all families were quite satisfied with the PDS. Further, they had many ideas and suggestions about what should be provided through the PDS and how the system can be improved. On the other hand, when we asked about cash transfers, their responses suggested that they thought it was a very bad idea. This is not just because they are satisfied with the PDS; they also commented on many disadvantages of the cash system. Some respondents became very suspicious when we asked them this question, perhaps thinking that we have little idea about poor villagers, their lifestyles and livelihood. It is understandable that any poor person would respond like this: They depend on the PDS shop to survive and, if you suggest closing it down, it seems to them that we are trying to take away the little that they have. If anyone snatches your food from you when you are hungry and about to eat, then how would you behave? You are likely to get angry and just say, “I want my food”. The poor villagers too want just the PDS, nothing else.

Returning to the problems with the PDS, most of them occur at the local level: unfair distribution, corruption, lack of awareness of entitlements, and so on. In many cases, people do not know what their ration card entitles them to. This makes it possible for the PDS dealer to cheat innocent, often illiterate, people.

Easily preventable

Some of these problems could be resolved if Gram Panchayats were functioning properly. However, most of the time no Gram Sabha meetings are held, and an opportunity to create awareness and accountability is lost. Panchayat officials get the signatures of “important” people in the village, and the Gram Sabha meetings are declared over. Those who suffer, again, are poor or illiterate people. Of course, there are exceptions where Gram Sabhas are held, but that is not the general rule. The Gram Panchayat is the most accessible forum for poor people, but if the Gram Panchayat functions like this, where can people go?

When we were in Kanika block of Sundergarh district, in Dalak village we encountered a large number of people who did not have ration cards, though they were poor by any yardstick. They need a card for their survival; in fact, they need it desperately. When we spoke to them they told us that the Panchayat Secretary had snatched their ration cards. When we confronted officials of the concerned Gram Panchayat, we were told that these people did not want their ration cards! If you are hungry and someone offered you food, would you refuse it? Are illiterate people not entitled to a ration card? They are but they need help to secure their rights.

There are many problems with the Public Distribution System, and a lot of scope for improvement. But does this mean that the PDS itself is wrong? No, it is very important for poor people — that is the prevalent feeling among the people we spoke to. The focus of the debate should be on how to improve the system. The PDS stands for food security of the rural poor — it is not only a government scheme, but an invaluable gift for the people.

The focus of the debate should be on how to improve the system.