In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

1613 - Identification issues: UIDAI, NPR and the growing list of identifiers

20 SEP, 2011, 04.39AM IST, ET BUREAU 

Ram Sewak Sharma, number two in the government organisation overseeing the national identity drive, cites a family incident to assert the importance of an ID. He comes from a village near Firozabad in Uttar Pradesh, whose government gives Rs 40,000 to a family in the event of its breadwinner's death.


When his cousin passed away, Sharma's sister-in-law received a cheque. But she could not encash it because she did not have a bank account. And she could not open one because she did not have any paper ID-no voter ID, no PAN, no ration card, nothing. "People feel the need for some identity document that is also valid across the country," he says.

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), headed by Nandan Nilekani, was conceived to service this need. It would give every Indian a unique number called Aadhaar, which would supercede all existing numbers and forms of identification. After Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, in Budget 2011, announced cash transfers as the eventual model to distribute welfare benefits, the UID became the anchor point for this movement of cash: for money to go into the correct person's account, he or she, to start with, had to be identified correctly.

However, increasingly, other arms of the government, both at the Centre and in the states, want their own anchors. The ministry of rural development is planning pilots to test its biometric ID cards for National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) workers. Orissa and Kerala are using smart cards of the national health programme to identify beneficiaries for other schemes.

The plan to allot UIDs to all Indians is showing scatter, putting under threat its adoption for all cash transfers.

UID OR NPR?

The original plan called for the UIDAI and the National Population Registry to work in tandem. The NPR, which conducts the National Census, would capture biometrics of every Indian: fingerprint and iris. It would issue an NPR card and transfer this data to the UIDAI, which would issue an Aadhaar.

So, every Indian would have an NPR card and an Aadhaar. But since the UIDAI was ready before NPR, it asked the government to let it capture biometrics till the NPR was ready. In June 2010, the government allowed it to cover 100 million people by March 2011, which it increased to 200 million by March 2012 and a budget of Rs 3,023 crore; the NPR would do biometrics for 1 billion.

The agreement was that, once the NPR was ready, the UIDAI would stop; and the NPR would not go to the people the UIDAI had covered. The NPR started capturing biometrics in June. A month earlier, the UIDAI proposed to cover the entire population by March 2017. Total cost: Rs 17,864 crore. "We will complete our 200 million target by March 2012...we should be allowed to keep enrolling even after 200 million," says Sharma. But the UIDAI is behind schedule. As of August 24, it had issued 28.7 million numbers-about one-fourth its target. Himanshu, a professor of economics at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, says cash transfers can't be rolled out for part of the population. "How can you arbitrarily decide that some people will receive cash, while others will get grain," he asks. "Those who do not want cash will simply baulk at signing up for Aadhaar."