In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

1610 - UID Behind Schedule, But Cash Isn’t Why - WSJ

SEPTEMBER 19, 2011, 2:08 PM IST

By Amol Sharma

The Nandan Nilekani-led program to issue a 12-digit unique ID number to all Indians is running well behind its own ambitious targets, but a lack of funding or government backing doesn’t appear to be the reason, contrary to a media report in The Sunday Guardian.

Raveendran/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
The Nandan Nilekani-led program to issue a unique ID number to all Indians is running well behind its own ambitious targets.

Mr. Nilekani, the former chief executive of outsourcing darling Infosys, was hoping to issue 100 million unique numbers by March of this year. But several months later, the program still hasn’t hit that target. Thus far, about 80 million people have gone through the sign-up process successfully and 32 million unique numbers have actually been issued, according to a person close to the UID program.

The media report said that Mr. Nilekani is upset the government isn’t allocating him more cash. The UID program requested about $745 million for its next phase of funding for 2012-2013, the article said, but the Planning Commission has recommended that the Finance Ministry approve less than half that amount, on the grounds that the UID project overlaps with another government scheme called the National Population Register.

Mr. Nilekani didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment, but the person close to the UID program said there’s no controversy over money – the project isn’t hitting any roadblocks due to lack of funds, the person said. UID was budgeted about $400 million in 2009-2010 and about $313 million for the current fiscal year ending in March 2012. It isn’t clear how much UID has requested for its next phase of funding. (The project’s phases don’t exactly line up with the annual budget cycle.)

That isn’t to say that gathering biometric data from 1.2 billion people – which involves scanning irises and taking 10 digital fingerprints in every city, town and hamlet – is proving straightforward. There have been technical growing pains, like ensuring that the data captured is good enough to be entered into the national UID database. Scaling up the sign-up process has been a significant challenge, the person close to the program said.

Still, there are some positive signs of progress lately. In July, 7.8 million people were enrolled; that accelerated to 12.9 million in August, or about 416,000 people per day. The challenge is to pick up the pace slightly and then sustain it for a long time. To reach the project’s next big target of signing up 600 million people by the end of 2014 Mr. Nilekani’s team will need to enroll closer to a half million people every day, on average.

Mr. Nilekani’s foray into government is worth watching closely. The theory behind his appointment was that after building an agile, efficient private sector enterprise like Infosys he could create a similar culture in a government body and confound the public’s expectation that New Delhi is doomed to mess up big projects. He needs plenty of cooperation from other government entities to pull off the UID rollout, of course. If Mr. Nilekani is meeting any resistance from other agencies or ministries, he isn’t talking about it publicly.

The government has taken some steps to make the UID number relevant, by allowing it to be accepted as a proof of identity to open bank accounts and to get a mobile phone. But the next challenge is to verify – or in tech lingo to “authenticate” – that a person is who they say they are. These institutions will have to install tools, probably fingerprint readers in many cases, that can do a quick look-up of a person in the national UID database and get a binary answer: yes, this is Amol Sharma, or no, this guy is a fraud.

Meanwhile, the UID has managed to move forward without the imprimatur of a legislative act of Parliament. Activists who oppose the program as a government overreach or an infringement on privacy (largely because of all the personal questions asked in the sign-up process) say this is disturbing. But Mr. Nilekani’s team has taken the view that it has every right to exist under executive order – its current status – and legislation is simply a way to strengthen some aspects of its authority and clarify issues like privacy. A UID bill is now before a standing committee in Parliament.

You can follow Mr. Sharma on Twitter @AmolSharmaWsj.

Follow India Real Time on Twitter @indiarealtime.