In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, September 25, 2011

1626 - Nilekani bats for 'Aadhaar' - TOI

TNN | Sep 25, 2011, 02.51AM IST

PUNE: Chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) Nandan Nilekani has said that the unique identity programme or 'Aadhaar' should not be viewed as "a technologically complicated and purposeless activity".

"The programme has much wider and scalable applications for ensuring effective and efficient delivery of public distribution system (PDS) and welfare services," he said while delivering the inaugural speech at the launch of the Pune International Centre (PIC) here on Saturday.

The PIC, headed by noted scientist R A Mashelkar, is a forum of leading intellectuals and citizens of Pune. The centre has been positioned along the lines of the India International Centre in New Delhi and will serve as a platform for open discussions and debates on socially relevant issues. Former union minister Mohan Dharia inaugurated the centre.

Speaking on 'Inclusive development and information technology', Nilekani said that lack of proof of identity remains a huge challenge for many Indians, especially at a time when the trend of large scale rural-to-urban migration is bound to increase over the next two or three decades. "Almost 50% of India is expected to be urbanised during this period," he added.

The prevailing systems for delivery of public distribution and welfare services are based more on static information. "The need for a ubiquitous common identity that is nationally and internationally acceptable, is essential as the moment you become a migrant, you are rendered anonymous in terms of drawing benefits such as ration card supplies, public health and education schemes etc.," he said.

Nilekani said, "Often it is asked why an Aadhaar card when we have identification documents like passport, driving license, PAN cards and voters' ID cards? The fact remains that of the country's 1.2 billion population, the number of people holding passports is 50 million i.e. less than 5%. Similarly, close to 100 million people have PAN cards; another 200 million people have driving licences and 700 million have voters' ID cards. There is a vast section of people who do not have any kind of ID proof."

Nilekani said that welfare schemes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGA), Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojna (RSBY), and Public Distribution System (PDS), among others, are meant to go to eligible individuals. "If your fundamental way of indentifying an individual is faulty then how are you to ensure benefits of these schemes are going to the right person?" he added.

Nilekani said, "India's spending on social sector schemes has gone up tremendously over the last 10 years. The total worth of benefits through these scheme is to the tune of Rs 3,00,000 crore per annum of which 50% is in the form of subsidies on LPG and kerosene and the remaining 50% on NREGA, mid-day meal, pensions, scholarhips etc."

He said, "Information technology has a very huge role to play in ensuring that public governance matches the rising expectations of a large pool of young people, who are impatient and want instant gratification and results. The pace of change in society is much faster."

The government's measures to raise tax collection through modernisation and reforms has led to 30% to 40% in the collections, which means greater spending on social sector initiatives. "It is important for us to see that this spending is done efficiently," he said.

Earlier, Mashelkar provided an overview of the PIC and its activities. Former union finance secretary Vijay Kelkar, Pune's former divisional commissioner Prabhakar Karandikar, KPIT Cummins chief Ravi Pandit, scientists Jayant Narlikar and Govind Swarup, Planning Commission member Narendra Jadhav, educationists S B Mujumdar and Vishwanath Karad, Prataprao Pawar, Satish Magar were among those present.