In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, October 1, 2011

1651 - 10,000 unique IDs may reach wrong addresses

By: Saurabh Katkurwar
Date:  2011-09-30;  Place: Mumbai

Many acknowledgement forms of Vashi residents of the Thane district mention the wrong districts and/or wrong post office in the mailing address, owing to software problems; apathetic operators have requested them to 'let it be'

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), spearheading AADHAR, the ambitious unique identification project, is on the brink of doling out uniquely erroneous ID cards to its applicants who live in Vashi. The project, which was inaugurated with great fanfare exactly a year ago, has run into trouble, owing to a faltering software system and apathetic officials.

Nandan Nilekani, a former co-chairman of Infosys Technologies, was
appointed as the first chairman of Aadhar in June 2009

When Vashi residents checked their acknowledgement forms online, they were shocked to discover that the software had erroneously categorised them as residents of the Raigarh district, even though the residential township in Navi Mumbai is situated in the heart of Thane district.

When bewildered residents brought this to the note of the operators at the UID centres, the errors were attributed to a 'technical snag' in the centralised software used for the UID project across the country. Adding insult to injury, the apathetic operators allegedly asked the residents to ignore the errors in the addresses.

Praful Mhatre's receipt also shows a different address

The residents fear that the erroneous mailing addresses could give rise to mayhem when the cards are dispatched to residents by post, as they could well reach Raigarh district instead of Thane.

Ironically, the Directorate of Information Technology of Maharashtra, which is one of the bodies significantly responsible for this slip up, received the Aadhaar Excellence Award at the programme's first anniversary celebrations, which were held in New Delhi yesterday.

Residentspeak
Vashi resident Praful Mhatre said, "I was shocked to discover that the software classifies residents with our pin code as inhabitants of the Raigarh district, and not Thane district. 
There were also mistakes in the entry of the post office, as well as grammatical errors. My residence falls under the jurisdiction of the Vashi post office, but the UID acknowledgement copy says it is Turbhe post office. When we approached the operators to get the mistakes rectified, they asked us to turn a blind eye to them. The UID card is going to be a very important document for us in the near future. How can such mistakes appear, when a separate body has been formed for the project, with highly qualified technicians on its rolls?"

Vijendra Khupte, resident of Vashi said, "When the software system showed Raigarh in the enrollment form instead of Thane, I refused to accept the printout, and asked the operator at the UID centre to fix the problem. In order to change the district to Thane, the operator simply changed my pin code from 400703, to 400705. So now, while my form shows the correct district, it has the wrong pin code, that of Sanpada." 

In another case, acknowledgement copies obtained by  three members of the same family showed different addresses.

Vashi resident Swapnil Mhaske said, "In the acknowledgement copies received by my mother and sister, the space under the category of district shows Mumbai, while mine shows Raigarh. We are all residents of Thane.

When we pointed out the errors to the operator, he shrugged and said he could not  do anything about technical errors."

Predicting some of the consequences of the snag, Mhatre said, "As the districts of Raigarh and Mumbai both have places named Vashi, there could be confusion during the delivery of the letters. The confused post offices would simply store the letters, or return them to the UIDAI."

Who's in charge?
As the hapless residents mull what their next move should be, the relevant authorities -- UIDAI's technical wing in Bangalore, the state government's IT department, and Navi Mumbai's Municipal Corporation (NMMC) -- are busy passing the buck to each other.

In Navi Mumbai, three firms -- Maha Online, Tera Software and Wipro -- have been assigned to carry out enrollment and registration for the project at 24 centres, while the NMMC has been appointed as the supervising body. It appears, however, that neither body is equipped with personnel who can tackle the technical errors that have cropped up.

Suresh Patil, deputy commissioner of NMMC, said, "NMMC's designated task is to provide space for the UID centres, and ensure smooth functioning of the process of enrolment and registration. We have not been asked to deal with technical snags."

Dattaray Patne, site in-charge with Wipro Limited, said, "The IT department of the state government provided us the client software. We were asked to apply the software, not modify it. We have asked the IT department to make the necessary rectifications."

Dr Santosh Bhogle, undersecretary of the Directorate of Information Technology, Maharashtra, said, "We are aware that errors have cropped up in the mailing addresses, and have contacted the regional office of UIDAI.

The officials in charge have assured us that they will fix the problems soon. We will be taking strong action against the UID centres if we learn that they are violating guidelines. We are planning to write to UIDAI seeking permission to stall the enrollment process at centres in Vashi, at least till the software issue can be sorted."

"We understand that the errors are occurring owing to the overlapping of information in the software system.

The technical wing of UIDAI in Bangalore designed the project software in association with a software firm called MindTree Ltd. We have called for a meeting on Sept 30 to discuss the fiasco," said an UIDAI official, on condition of anonymity.

R S Sharma, director general of UIDAI, however, could not be reached for comment.

Shobha Madhale, director of Mumbai GPO, said, "We have tied up with the UIDAI for delivery of UID number letters. If the letters are not delivered, we will be returning them to the sender, the UIDAI."

Asked about the measures taken to ensure delivery of the cards, Patil replied, "The NMMC has sent a letter to post offices in Vashi, asking them to deliver the letters they receive from the UIDAI, even if the district is mentioned as Raigarh and not Thane. 

The number of companies appointed by the state's IT department for enrollment and registration of the UID applications

2.6 crore : The number of applicants who have enrolled for unique identities in Maharashtra

87 lakh : The number of applicants who have received UID numbers in the state so far

3 lakh : The number of Navi Mumbai residents who have enrolled for UIDs in the last eight months 

1,000 : The number of acknowledgement forms that have errors in the mailing address