In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, October 29, 2011

1748 - State depts refuse to accept UID cards as proof - TOI

Prafulla Marpakwar, TNN | Oct 29, 2011, 01.49AM IST

MUMBAI: IT icon Nandan Nilekani's ambitious unique identification (UID) project has hit a major roadblock in Maharashtra, as most departments have refused to accept the Aadhar card as proof of age and residence.

A senior UID bureaucrat said that the card has no legal validity since the Congress-Nationalist Congress Party government had not issued a notification. "As per norms prescribed by the Centre, the state government has to notify the legal validity of the Aadhar card, and then only will it be accepted as an identity card and proof of residence. It appears that so far the state government has not issued the notification. There appears to be lack of coordination at all levels,'' he said.

The UID project was launched in the tribal Nandurbar district of north Maharashtra on September 30 last year in the presence of Congress president Sonia Gandhi and prime minister Manmohan Singh. When Nilekani proposed the card, the main purpose was to obviate the need to produce multiple documents to prove one's identity. As per official records, while three crore persons have registered for the UID project, 1.25 crore cards have been issued across the state.

The card is issued after personal verification of all documents, particularly proof of residence and date of birth, and is a valid document for identity to open a bank account, secure a driving licence or purchase a motor vehicle. "It was mainly for all who don't have an identity card," he said.

Besides most state departments, even regional transport offices were not accepting the card as proof of residence in Mumbai. A week back, when a Borivli resident approached the Andheri transport office, he was told that it was not valid as proof of residence and that he should produce a ration card issued by the food and civil supplies department or passport.

"They told me that not only the Aadhar card, but even the driving licence is not acceptable as proof of residence. Now, I am securing a ration card to establish my proof of residence. I was shocked to know the transport department is not accepting the Aadhar card as proof of residence," he said.
While there was no response from chief secretary Ratnakar Gaikwad on the card's legal validity, transport commissioner V N More said he will conduct an inquiry as to why it was not accepted by the Andheri transport office. "If the officers are at fault, we will take action against the erring staff," More said.

He said following specific instructions from the ministry of surface transport and highways, RTOs across the state have been told to accept the card as proof of residence while issuing driving licences and for registration of vehicles.

A top bureaucrat admitted that it in the absence of a notification, even if the cards are issued, most departments were reluctant to accept them as a legal document. "Apparently, the government plans to issue the notification after all Aadhar cards are issued across the state. We feel that it will be too late, as it will take at least two years to complete the exercise. Chief minister Prithviraj Chavan must step in ask all departments to accept the card as proof of residence," he said.