In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, October 6, 2011

1673 - ET Awards: Nandan Nilekani, the right man for a unique challenge - Economic Times

ET Bureau Oct 5, 2011, 03.29am IST


Nandan Nilekani is the man entrusted with giving every Indian a unique identity number. For some, this project, called Aadhaar, will mark liberation from the tyranny of multiple ID documents. For a majority of Indians, especially the poor and those living in villages, this 12-digit number is a vehicle of empowerment, which would deliver welfare and commercial services they have never received as promised.

An opportunity to bring about this transformation made Nilekani leave the safety net of Infosys, the IT company he co-founded and lifted to great heights, and throw himself into the hurly-burly of government in July 2009.

"There was no hesitation in my mind as I had always dreamt of this," he says of the offer that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh made him. "As a child, I had watched my father and uncle closely, and heard family conversations on public policy."

The move from CEO to, effectively, a cabinet minister heading the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) presented unique challenges. A CEO in the private sector engages with a small group, like a board of directors or management. But public policy requires engaging with an array of stakeholders: politicians, bureaucracy, civil society, media and the intended beneficiaries of a policy, among others. Says the 56-year-old Nilekani: "The challenge lies in how you navigate the mosaic of different points of view and how you evangelise them to a wider section of people, the stakeholders."
The UIDAI has encountered many points of view about its work, especially lately. Its initial mandate was to just issue Aadhaar to 1.2 billion Indians based on their biometrics. Along the way, it offered to also collect biometrics of 100 million Indians till the time the National Population Register (NPR) was ready. It subsequently offered to do 200 million, and the government agreed. But its recent demand to do all 1.2 billion biometrics has been turned down.

The difficulty, says Nilekani, lies in showing various stakeholders it is a win-win. "We have tried to make each stakeholder, like state governments, banks and other ministries, an ally so that differences are minimised," he says. "You have to know the drivers and then work on them. No one can say they are against public good."

Over time, Nilekani has become, as one UIDAI officer puts it, the "government's chief technology officer". Besides leading the Aadhaar drive, he is spearheading a committee that is advising the government on best technologies the state and people can benefit from.

He is also in charge of, among other things, creating the technology architecture that will see the benefits from about Rs 3,00,000 crore of welfare schemes - NREGS, fertiliser and kerosene subsidies, and food subsidies, among others - be eventually transferred directly to bank accounts of identified beneficiaries, thus plugging the leakages in the system that currently exist.

Research firm CLSA estimates that about 40% of the government's $250 billion subsidy and social spending outlay in select schemes is siphoned off.

On September 29, 2010, UIDAI issued the first Aadhaar in Maharashtra's Tembhli village; and so far, it has collected about 100 million biometrics and issued about 40 million numbers. As government solutions go, Aadhaar is uncharacteristic. It relies on technology to establish and authenticate identity, and facilitate transactions.

As the government's way of working goes, the UIDAI is also uncharacteristic in its construct. It is the first instance of a corporate chieftain crossing over to government in a public policy role of great importance and magnitude. In that context, Nilekani is a great fit.