In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, October 2, 2011

1668 - Aadhaar Dispute Rages On - Yentha

The central government wants to know the details of a particular person on 8 different topics while the state government has asked for 15 
By Yentha
On Sep 29, 2011

'Aadhaar' registration work in progress

Trivandrum: Yentha had earlier reported the controversy (Controversy Shrouds ‘Aadhaar’ Project)  regarding the collection of  data for Aadhaar between the state government and the post office which is an agency of the central government.

The government has already started distributing forms and collecting photographs from  citizens for  ‘Aadhaar’ (Unique Identity Number) project which has been initiated by the central government and is being carried out through the postal agency. It has also the backing of the state government, which distributes forms through various sources like ‘Akshaya.’ But, apparently there seems to be confusion between the data collected by the state government and that collected by the central government.

While speaking to Yentha, an official from State department explained, “Both the state and central governments are equal partners in the project. While the central government wants to know the details of a particular person on 8 different topics, the state government has asked for 15. The extra data is being collected by the state government as part of the department integration plan and the questions naturally vary with each department. The information thus collected would prove to be a valuable asset for the state government when it comes to implementing aid and subsidies to the BPL (below poverty line) families.”

While the explanation seems to fit, the question still remains whether a person living well below the poverty line, who applies for Aadhaar using the form from the post office, which does not contain relevant questions, is eligible for the aid or subsidy.

When Yentha contacted the postal department to clarify it, we were informed that while the central government has prepared the form on a KYR (Know Your Resident) basis, the state government has prepared it as ‘KYRPlus’. The business development officials of the postal department had this to say to Yentha: “We are functioning according to the guide lines set for us by the central government. The forms that we distribute, has both KYR and KYRPlus in it. Information specified for a particular department would be collected through KYRPlus and it will vary with the department of concern.”

Yentha pointed this contradictory factor to the attention of Aadhaar officials and made  further investigation about the development of this contradiction. We first approached Keltron, which developed software for Kerala UID database collection. Identity Card Project, General Manager Nandhini said, “Keltron has also been doing work for Aadhaar. We are concentrating on the urban areas of Kerala. At present we are working in Ernakulam, Pathanamthitta, Kollam, Alappuzha and Trivandrum districts and a totalof 2 lakh people have registered through our centres. We have requested the Postal Department to share the Software. We have discussed this matter in our meeting also.”

We also contacted State Department coordinator Rajeevan to know how much effective their efforts have been. He said, “We intervened in the matter and told the postal department to use the data base of Kerala. We had also given them the software training for it.”

However, postal officials say that they have not taken the decision to include the details that the state government wants. The official said, “We are only getting Rs.50 from Central Government for the UID of one person. Two agencies are doing the work for us. We are paying Rs. 35 for this agency and the remaining Rs 15 is the profit of Postal department. In this we have to meet the salary of the staff also. Then how is it possible for us to print additional data that the state government wants? If we insist, they will demand more money for it.”

All these details prove that Aadhaar work is progressing in Kerala along with this controversy. Somehow a person who has taken Aadhaar already has to face this dilemma.