In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, October 21, 2011

1715 - JUGULAR VEIN Figure ID out - TOI

Jug Suraiya 
Oct 21, 2011, 12.00AM IST

The sarkar has a problem: how does one figure out India?  

Literally figure it out. Some 1.21 billion Indians make up India, and this figure keeps on increasing every day. And there seem to be more of us Indians than there actually are. Because, unlike in other places where people are more or less similar to each other in terms of language, food habits, etc, in India everyone seems to be different from everyone else, making it seem as though there is not just one but many Indias, populated by a multiplicity of Indians, each one having more than one identity.

For instance, while all of us are Indians, some of us are Punjabi Indians, some are Bengali Indians, Tamil Indians, Nicobar and Andamanese Indians, Kashmiri Indians (though Pakistan might say that these are really Pakistani Indians) and so on and so forth. There are Indians who are Hindu, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, Parsi, atheist, communist, Maoist. There are Indians (very few) who live in skyscraper buildings with helipads on the roof called Antilia and Indians (too many) who have to make do with less than 32 a day for roti and kapda, never mind non-essential items like makan, education and basic healthcare.

How do you figure out all these Indias, all these Indians? How do you give each one of us a numeric method of identifying ourselves to the sarkar? That's when the sarkar hit upon the wheeze of giving each and every one of us a 12-digit Unique Identification Number. The sarkar reckoned that by doing this it could both metaphorically as well as literally figure out India, the many Indias, and the multiple Indians who inherit these manifold Indias.

Once the Unique Identification Number (UID) programme is complete, the sarkar will have got you and me numerically tagged. For instance, so far as the sarkar is concerned, you will no longer be, say, a Bhojpuri-speaking, English-knowing vegetarian kayasth Sufist earning 25,000 a month as a computer operator in a design studio who reads Deepak Chopra and Chetan Bhagat in her spare time, but a 12-digit number instead which will be your official ID, your identity as an Indian citizen. And the sarkar can justifiably say: Gotcha - we've got you all figured out.

But has it? Has the sarkar got us all figured out with its UID scheme which is expected to cost some 1,50,000 crore to implement? We Indians, all Indians, have perhaps one thing in common: an innate genius for what might be called a creative reinterpretation of all rules and regulations. Be it traffic rules and regulations, taxation and other financial rules and regulations, or any other rules and regulations you care to name, we will find innovative and ingenious ways to get around, under, above, behind and through them with an agility which would do an Olympic gymnast proud. Will we do this with the rules and regulations pertaining to the UID as well?
What happens if a numerologist informs a client that the UID assigned to the client is an inauspicious number that spells doom and disaster for the client? Will the said client get the unlucky number officially changed by deed poll? Seek recourse to the black market of fake UIDs that will spring up as black markets have sprung up for fake ration cards, driver's licences, passports, voter cards, you name it? How do you tell a fake UID from a real one? By holding it up to the light to see if it's got a black thingummy through it like bank notes do? Biting it like you do with gold to see if it's hard or soft? Flipping it in the air to see if it makes a dull or a ringing sound when it lands?

The possibilities are endless. And as i think about them my mind, already numb, becomes - what else? - even number.