In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

1703 - India builds world's largest biometric ID database - UK Authority

Monday 17 October 2011
Author: Dan Jellinek

India builds world's largest biometric ID database

Details of how some of the world's most underprivileged people could be brought government services for the first time with the help of biometric identification technologies are to emerge at this year's Biometrics 2011 conference, opening in Westminster tomorrow.

Facial recognition systems using high definition cameras to identify people in controlled settings such as a border post or informal situations such as a crowd on a railway station platform, are underpinning a universal citizen ID system being rolled out across India's 1.2 billion population.

The Unique Identification Authority of India's (UIDAI) Aadhaar program - taken from the Sanskrit word for base or foundation - will create the world's largest database of individuals at an estimated cost of up to US$4.4bn. It will use multiple types of biometric data including retina scans, fingerprints and multiple facial images. A consortium consisting of Accenture with software firm Daon and Indian outsourcing specialist MindTree was one of three technology groups selected last year to build the system.

Mark Crego, senior defence and public safety executive at Accenture, told UKAuthority.com the fingerprint and iris data has already been captured for 100 million people, with facial recognition as a further check that data is correct by matching numbers with gender and age band. "Sometimes you might be enrolling the whole family, in which case the officer entering the data might get it wrong. But using the technology, you can match on age as well, so the system could see if a male adult number was being wrongly ascribed to a 12-year-old girl, for example.

The vast process of registering all India's citizens, including those in extremely remote areas, inevitably involves a mix of high and low tech solutions, Crego said. While registration officials would have access to high-tech portable or mobile enrolment stations, often the results of registration including biometrics would have to be saved onto encrypted thumb-drives and sent back to base in the ordinary postal service, he said.

Although face-matching technologies have been in use for more than a decade, huge improvements to the algorithms used have led to far greater accuracy over the past five years, Crego said. "What we see now has nearly the same accuracy as two fingerprints, in controlled circumstances."

While facial recognition is still best-known for use at national borders - such as at Heathrow and Stansted airports - they can also now identify travellers even before they get to the gate, for example as they leave a train at the airport, he said. Systems can also be used to check that people in a controlled area of the airport such as runway or hangar areas are supposed to be there. They can also recognise gender and estimate age of a group or crowd of people, Crego said, which could be of use in situations such as sporting events to identify where security personnel might be needed most without slowing down the flow of people into an area with formal individual checking. 

Despite all the recent improvements in accuracy, however, even the best facial recognition systems are still wrong with false matches or incorrect clearances up to 5% of the time, Crego said. This means the technique must be carefully managed alongside other data to ensure "you don't cause officers to jump when they don't need to jump."


The Unique Identification Authority of India http://uidai.gov.in/