In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

2363 - PM saves Aadhaar for his image, but can’t stop duplication - Deccan Herald


Ajith Athrady,Feb 06, 2012, DHNS:

Amidst sharp differences between the Nandan Nilekani-led Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and the Union home ministry over the collection of biometric details of resident Indians, prime minister Manmohan Singh has tried to resolve the tussle to some extent. But even after the clumsy patch-up exercise, several questions remain unanswered.


According to a decision of the cabinet committee on UIDAI headed by the prime minister, the UIDAI, apart from covering 20 crore population, it will now capture the biometric details of an additional 40 crore people in 16 states. It claims to have so far covered 17 crore residents. The National Population Registry (NPR) under the home ministry, will capture the biometric details of the remaining 60 crore people.

While ending the turf war, the committee seems to have tried to placate both UIDAI chairman Nilekani and home minister P Chidambaram by slicing the population cake into two. But the question of duplication remains. Chidambaram does admit some duplication in the task, but he insists that such problems will arise in mega scheme covering the entire 120 crore population.

The home minister also claims that wherever the UIDAI collects the biometric details, the same will not be captured by the NPR. Instead the latter will use the former’s data.

Despite the clear-cut division of information gathering, the home ministry will also set up its camps across the country and collect all other details except the biometric for NPR purposes. If a person has already given his biometric data, he can disclose it at the camp and submit all other details.

This means that a person who has enrolled himself for Aadhaar number under UIDAI, has to visit another camp set up by the RGI authorities to prepare NPR data and get the multi purpose national identity card, as it is mandatory.

If a person does not have a UID number, he can get both Aadhaar number and the NPR card after providing his biometric details at one of the ministry’s camps conducted for collecting details for NPR. According to the home minister, the biometric details of those having Aadhaar numbers will be verified with the NPR data and in case of variance, the Aadhaar data will be corrected.

It means that 17 crore people, who have sought or received Aadhaar, will have to mandatorily enrol for NPR also. Another 40 crore people, for which UID Authority now has the mandate to enrol in next 18-20 months, will also have to visit the NPR camp. They will get the NPR card with the same Aadhaar number. If a person directly goes to the NPR centre without visiting the Aadhaar camp he too can get the citizenship card along with Aadhaar number on it.

Confused people

A senior official said, “If that is the agreed process, why should people go for Aadhaar enrolment? They can as well wait for the NPR camp. This has not been adequately answered by the government. In all probability, the confused people will be forced to go to both the camps for Aadhaar number and for citizenship card.”

After the UIDAI enrollment got embroiled in controversy following Chidambaram questioning the method adopted for capturing the biometric details, the UPA government was under pressure to salvage the Aadhaar scheme as it was the prime minister’s one of the pet projects. Besides, the government is banking heavily on Aadhaar to adopt electronic delivery system to plug leakages in the public distribution system. The Centre does not want to stop enrolment momentum of the UIDAI which is moving at a fast pace.

It is crucial for the government to link social welfare schemes such as PDS, old age pension and widow pensions with Aadhaar to check pilferage and reduce the subsidy burden. The government’s annual subsidy burden is over Rs 1 lakh crore.

Moreover, the UPA government, which is at the receiving end criticism owing to a series of corruption charges, is in a hurry to complete the Aadhaar enrolment to improve the social security delivery system. The UIDAI which has already conducted pilot projects about delivery systems like the MNREGS in Jharkhand, the LPG cylinder delivery system in Mysore, opening of bank accounts in Tumkur is getting ready to showcase its success in Aadhaar in Delhi soon to prove its usefulness.

Though the committee headed by the prime minister has fixed a deadline of mid-2013 for both the RGI and UIDAI, insiders say, the Congress leaders are keen that Aadhaar work is completed before the next Lok Sabha poll, even if the home ministry does not do so.

The government seems to be confident that UIDAI will complete its the task by June 2013, and start rolling out subsidy scheme only to targeted beneficiaries through Aadhaar number holders.

Nandan Nilekani was brought in by the government to head UIDAI to send a message to the global community that it was serious about reforms and involvement of successful corporate sector leaders in governance. If UIDAI fails at this juncture, the UPA’s image would be dented further. Hence, the prime minister worked over time to bring about a truce between Nilekani and Chidambaram.