In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 20, 2012

2390 - Congress toils to win TMC support on food bill - Deccan Herald


Monday 20 February 2012
News updated at 5:07 PM IST

Anirban Bhaumik NEW DELHI:
Minister Thomas likely to meet Mamata on March 2
Desperate to avert yet another confrontation with the Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress, the Centre on Thursday scurried into efforts to take Banerjee on board over the National Food Security Bill ahead of the Budget Session of Parliament.

A day after the West Bengal government formally conveyed its reservations over the National Food Security Bill, Union Food Minister, K V Thomas, promised resolve  differences over the ambitious legislation, which seeks to give legal entitlement to subsidised grains to 75 per cent and 50 per cent of the rural and urban population respectively.

Thomas is likely to travel to Kolkata in the first week of March to meet Banerjee. Food Minister’s office proposed a meeting with West Bengal Chief Minister in Kolkata on March 2.

The NFSB was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year and is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress-led United Progressive Alliance Government hopes to get it passed in the ensuing Budget Session.

“I will possibly go to Kolkata on March 2. We will discuss with the State Government about the issues it raised in connection with the proposed National Food Security Act,” Thomas told journalists in New Delhi, after a two-day conference of the food and agriculture ministers of all the States and Union Territories concluded.

The conclave was convened by the Ministry of Food, Public Distribution and Consumer Affairs to discuss ways to strengthen the Targeted Public Distribution System and enhance storage capacity before the NFSB is passed by Parliament.

No minister from West Bengal participated in the conclave, but what sent the alarm bells ringing for the Centre was a note the officials representing the State Government submitted to the Union Ministry of Food, Public Distribution and Consumer Affairs., to put on record its reservations about the NFSB, particularly on the spread of food security net the proposed legislation would put in place.

The NBSB proposes to designate 46 per cent of rural and 28 per cent of urban population as priority groups to be brought under the food security net. But West Bengal Government argued against imposition of any limit by the Centre and sought greater role for itself in selecting the beneficiaries both in the priority and general categories. The TMC has support from the Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar and the AIADMK government in Tamil nadu.

The Congress-led Government at the Centre is worried over the prospects of Banerjee’s AITC – a constituent of the ruling UPA – joining the opposition parties like the AIADMK and JD (U), an ally of the Bharatiya Janata Party, to oppose the NFSB in Parliament.

The AITC had in December last joined the other opposition parties to take on the Government on the issue of Lokayukta provisions in Lokpal Bill and the Government’s decision to open up retail sector further for foreign investment.