In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, February 16, 2012

2382 - Nandan Nilekani on UID controversy - Business Today


Shweta Punj        February 14, 2012


UIDAI Chairman Nandan Nilekani spoke with Business Today on the Aadhaar project in November 2011 and January 2012. Excerpts:

How are you reacting to all the controversies surrounding the UID project?
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance finds the UID project to be "conceptualised with no clarity" and "directionless". The big issue is who does the enrolment. Within the government everybody agrees you need the UID and you need the applications. The only question is who does the enrolment. I think the best way to deal with that is to show its usefulness. To show fundamentally this is a capability which will allow you to give unmatched benefits to people. I think that's what going to win the debate. (Audio: Listen to the interview)

There are huge privacy concerns that have been raised. The worry is that UID could open up data for manipulation.
Privacy is something you trade for convenience. Even when you talk on the phone, you are subjecting yourself to the risk of being overheard -talking on phone could be taken as invasion of privacy. But the fact that I have a cell phone and anybody can reach me anywhere is an empowering thing that I am willing to take the risk for that. When you want to apply for loan, you will share all details of your assets---now that is also confidential information. But you are doing that for the benefit of getting a better loan.  The information we collect is name, age, date of birth and sex. This is information that is already available if you have a voter card or a passport.

Once the convenience of UID is understood, they will understand what they are giving up is very trivial. Of course they are giving biometrics, which other people don't take. But we have kept biometrics offline. I am quite comfortable that argument can be argued. All we are doing is that we are giving an online ID. We think this is just an online ID system. Nobody has access to the data. The data is anonymised.  It is not shared with any private company. Some very modern principles of security have been used. This is the world's first online ID system. From no ID to an online ID -we are jumping two steps.
You often describe Aadhaar as an app store for development -which sectors specifically do you see innovation coming in?
Sky is the limit! There will be three sets of applications. One set of applications will be government applications -which will include financial inclusion, electronic transfer of benefits, PDS reforms etc. Second set of applications could be enterprise applications -for instance, FMCG companies could design an application to improve last mile connectivity. Supply chain management could use it for supply chain. Third set would be consumer applications which will be done by entrepreneurs.

You will see that the public service interface will become more professional. We are doing to the common man what liberalisation did for the middle class.

I give the example of GPS, which was given to me by the CEO of Nokia, because GPS was developed by the U.S. Department of Defence for the purpose of missile targeting. But in Clinton's time, they put the technology in civilian domain. And now you have GPS used by planes, cars, google maps. And GPS only answers one question: Where am I? We are only answering: Who am I?

What change have we seen in the last one year?
There are several ecosystems that have been created. First, is the enrolment ecosystem - we have 50 registrars, 75 enrolling agencies and in that we have created an ecosystem of 70,000 operators. Within that there is a device ecosystem. We standardized the components --anybody who met our standards could become a certified supplier. And that has created an ecosystem that is driving innovation, choice, competition and cost reduction. 

Till now, the biometric space was not industrialised, we industrialised the space. When we began, an Iris camera was costing something like Rs1.3 lakh, now it costs between Rs.30,000- Rs.40,000. So we created this device ecosystem for enrolment. Once we get into authentication - we will have a similar ecosystem for device authentication. 

An authentication device could be a scanner certified again by UIDAI and STQC?
Right, what we are certifying is a scanner. This scanner can be plugged into anything -laptop, cell phone, tablet, Smartphone. It's an open architecture.

Authentication device is much more lightweight. For instance, Micro ATM is one application of authentication system. It is a device that supports financial transactions. Same thing can be used for any authentication - any service that requires authentication of an identity. Like for SIM cards, you have to fill a form and prove your identity. People with no identity find it difficult to get a mobile phone connection. SIM cards are sold by Kirana shop owners in someone else's name. But security guys are tightening all this up. The term cell of the Department of Telecommunications audits the kirana shop owners. The total fines from the mobile industry exceed Rs500 Cr. This is a big problem!

So, essentially people who do not have phone connections are those who are ID challenged?
Right, the mobile industry is not adding many new virgin customers. Most new customers are those who are changing their service providers. This would help the industry add more customers. Right now you can show your aadhaar letter, tomorrow it will be online. Anyone who has an aadhaar number, can go to a place which has an online platform, authenticate themselves and get a Sim card.

What is your vision of UID? What according to you can it mean for the country say in the next decade or so? 
Because this is an online ID on the cloud, it can be verified anywhere. No other system gives you that. It becomes a gateway to public services. We think in the future three numbers will be empowering - Aadhaar number -the number with which you can confirm who you are to anybody; mobile number, and bank account number. These would be the three numbers of an aspiring Indian. In our vision these numbers are with you and they travel with you.