In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, February 24, 2012

2402 - UPA makes its case for cash transfers - Live Mint


Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2012. 12:15

Panel says all cash payments above Rs1,000 should be made electronically into Aadhaar-linked accounts
Remya Nair & Surabhi Agarwa

New Delhi: India moved a step closer to implementing cash transfers of direct subsidies and social welfare payments after a high-level panel presented the blueprint for effecting it through an Aadhaar-based payment gateway.
Accepting the report, which details how all payments and cash transfers can be made electronically, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee indicated that it will be the key to plug leakages and ensure more targeted spending under the government’s social welfare programmes.

The timing of the submission of the report, just weeks ahead of the presentation of the Union budget on 16 March, is significant 


The panel, headed by Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) chairman Nandan Nilekani, proposed that eventually all cash payments above Rs1,000 should be transferred electronically into Aadhaar-linked bank accounts, making cash payments using Aadhaar almost universal and lending even greater legitimacy to one of the government’s crucial initiatives that has run into rough weather in recent months.

Subsidy payments and benefits under different schemes amount to almost Rs3 trillion, roughly 3.5% of GDP, according to government estimates.

To incentivize banks to process government payment electronically, the task force has recommended a transaction fee of 3.14% for each payment. It also wants banks to set up a network of interoperable micro-ATMs for ensuring easier access of funds by beneficiaries.

Mukherjee, in his budget speech last year, had announced the creation of the task force to propose a system for direct transfer of subsidy for kerosene, LPG (cooking gas) and fertilizer, and later extended the terms of reference to include the development of an Aadhaar-enabled unified payment architecture.

The task force proposes an e-payment gateway through which the finance ministry will release funds to various ministries for transfer of subsidies and benefits under different schemes. 

These funds will then be transferred from the government into Aadhaar-enabled bank accounts of beneficiaries through a central payment platform. All the government departments need to do is submit details of the beneficiary such as the Aadhaar number and amount to be paid to the bank. The bank will then process the payment and the funds will be credited into the account.

The beneficiary can withdraw the money through either bank branches or business correspondents equipped with micro-ATMs. National Payments Corporation of India already operates an Aadhaar-enabled payment system.

N.C. Saxena, member, National Advisory Council, said it remains to be seen whether direct transfer of cash subsidies will work in India.

“Cash payments are done in India for pensions and under schemes like Janani Suraksha Yojana and are working well to a certain extent,” he said. “But cash transfer will not work as a substitute for the public distribution system. What will the government do with 60 million tonnes of foodgrains it procures from farmers if it opts for cash payments?”

“At a smaller level, say in a slum area, where there is a bank branch, cash transfers could be effective. But at a macro level, it may not work. As it is, people in rural areas do not have bank branches,” he added.

The task force has recommended that banks be paid a transaction fee of 3.14% with a cap of Rs20 per transaction for each government payment. It also proposes the creation of a network of 10 lakh interoperable micro-ATMs operated by business correspondents across the country for easier access of bank accounts.

“The idea for this task force emerged after it was realized that there is no single platform to transfer Rs1.5 trillion of government subsidy electronically to beneficiaries. If all states and government departments start to build their own platforms, it will result in a lot of duplication, waste of public money and resources, apart from complicating things,” said a senior government official close to the development. “So, a single platform has to be created to handle any kind of transfer by any government department in the future,” added this person, who did not want to be identified.

UIDAI has already started a pilot in Jharkhand to test the Aadhaar-enabled payment system for the government’s flagship job guarantee scheme MGNREGS, another in Mysore for LPG subsidy, and a third in Alwar, Rajasthan, for kerosene subsidy.

To reduce the use of cash in the economy, the task force also recommends that government-owned institutions accept electronic payments at all locations where they collect payments from citizens, without any additional surcharge.
UIDAI has enrolled 200 million people and has issued Aadhaar numbers to 133 million so far. It proposes to issue 600 million unique IDs by 2014.
Bankers and others believe the transition will not be easy.

At the moment, interoperability of business correspondents, central to the Aadhaar-based payment gateway, is not permitted by the Reserve Bank of India.

There are other issues as well, said the representative of a banks’ lobby, notably, the IT systems of the banks themselves and the scalability of the Aadhaar back-end.

“Banks will have to make a lot of investment in upgrading their IT infrastructure as most no-frill accounts are on a financial inclusion server and not on the bank’s core banking platform,” said K. Unnikrishnan, deputy chief executive of Indian Banks’ Association. “The Aadhaar-based verification takes around 5-10 seconds at present. It remains to be seen if UIDAI will be able to scale up to meet the large volumes. Also there are some practical issues such as mismatch of fingerprints if the hands of the worker are dirty and covered with mud.”

Banks may also be reluctant to trust the “know your customer” (KYC) verification procedures followed by other banks and their business correspondents, a senior RBI official, who did not want to be named, said recently.

The finance ministry had in December 2010 amended the Prevention of Money Laundering Rules, 2005, to notify Aadhaar as adequate to meet KYC norms for opening bank accounts, putting it alongside the passport, driving licence,permanent account number card, and the voter’s identity card.

An executive at a technology company said that some issues such as authentication and security still need to be resolved. “Banks are already moving towards two-factor authentication, biometrics-enabled UID number-linked accounts for financial inclusion, etc. So, I don’t see them resisting incremental spending on creating an infrastructure for this as well,” he said.

However, this person, who did not want to be identified, said that it is a significant opportunity for technology companies as it will involve a sizable number of devices, interoperablity, creation of a payment gateway and linking of core banking system.

remya.n@livemint.com