In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, February 9, 2012

2380 - Pranab banks on Aadhar to reform public distribution system -


08 February 2012

Reforming the delivery mechanism is key to an effective, transparent and inclusive public distribution system in the country and the main challenge before the PDS today is reaching foodgrains to the actual beneficiaries without leakages and diversion en route to the grass-root level, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee said today.
Digitising the database of beneficiaries and computerisation of the entire food supply chain will remain the main stepping-stones to making the PDS successful, he said.
The finance minister was addressing a conference on public distribution system in the capital.
PDS faces challenges like leakages and diversion of foodgrains, inclusion/exclusion errors, fake and bogus ration cards, lack of transparency, weak grievance redressal and social audit mechanisms, viability of fair price shops, etc,'' he said, adding that the best way to address these is through leveraging Aadhar for unique identification.

''Leveraging Adadhaar is one of the critical components in reforming the PDS. The beneficiaries of PDS can be enrolled into the Aadhaar system,'' Mukherjee said.
It is a complex and challenging task as PDS operates in 35 states and UTs through more than 5 lakh fair price shops across diverse operating environments.  

'The use of the Aadhaar number in PDS will reduce ''duplicates'', ''fakes'' and ''ghost beneficiaries'' in PDS databases, which will result in reducing wastage and diversion in the system.
''Portability of benefits in PDS is of critical importance due to the migrant nature of India's poor population who are the most important targets of the food security Act. An Aadhaar enabled system makes access to PDS benefits portable across a state and also the country,'' he said.
This, he said, would empower the PDS beneficiary due to portability of benefits and choice of the PDS shop.
The bargaining power will shift from the supplier to the beneficiary, which will support empowerment and bring about improved accountability, he added.
''The use of Aadhar would make the schemes transparent, help eliminate leakages and corruption and empower the beneficiaries to get what is indeed their right,'' he said.
The National Food Security Bill 2011 specifically refers to the need for targeted public distribution system (TPDS) reforms to leverage Aadhaar for unique identification, with authentication of entitled beneficiaries for proper targeting of benefits under the Act.
Strengthening of PDS would also require computerisation of operations and an active involvement of panchayati raj institutions and local community as also a responsive, ICT-enabled grievance redressal mechanism, he said.
Besides ensuring access to food for all, the country also needs to ensure basic nutrition to all and should help it realise the larger goal of rapid economic development, he said.
Sustained high economic growth in recent past has led to improvements in purchasing power in both rural and urban areas.
Citing the 12th Plan approach paper, he said, the average real wages in India increased 16 per cent between 2007 and 2010.
The growth was fastest in Andhra Pradesh (42 per cent) and Odhisa (33 per cent). Even in states like Bihar and UP the real farm wages went up by 19 and 20 per cent, respectively, over this period. This has increased demand for certain goods and services, which has translated into persistent high inflationary pressures for those goods in the economy.
''The supply response has been inadequate and along with weather induced shortages in the food economy, have resulted in significant challenges for inflation management,'' he pointed out.
''Hopefully we are now out of this high inflationary phase, assisted by what appear to be two back-to-back bumper agricultural harvests.''
Yet, he said, for a country with growing population and a sustained growth momentum, food security challenge is ultimately a challenge of improving agriculture productivity.