In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

7154 -

Forcing people to get Aadhaar card: A violation of Supreme Court order


When Aadhaar was unfolded with a lot of fanfare by UPA-II government, serious objections tumbled out from print and electronic media and several few experts pinpointing the grave risks to the citizens. By collecting and holding all the personal details, the state can easily put the individuals to ransom, if needed. We are regularly flooded with information how unscrupulous elements are playing havoc with our money in banks by way of knowing our account number or credit card details or ATM pin. Less we talk about our Income Tax returns exposed to mafia elements, the better.

All personal information about the citizens will also be available with the private companies involved in the UID scheme for a period of 7 years. There are very many outside companies. One such company was promoted by the notorious Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the USA.

In Focus

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in the Apex Court challenging the validity of Aadhaar on several grounds. Infringing the fundamental rights of a citizen and endangering the sovereignty of the nation were among several issues pointed out in the PIL. The petition was admitted by the Supreme Court and the matter is subjudice.

During the interregnum, oil marketing companies (OMCs) started insisting people to produce Aadhaar card to avail subsidy on cooking gas. Several other state agencies forced people to produce Aadhaar card to enjoy a few other facilities. This was brought to the notice of the Supreme Court by the petitioners.

The Supreme Court had scrapped the Aadhaar card in its interim order, saying that it was not mandatory to avail the card to get government subsidies. But people are still being asked to furnish the cards, once they are issued, to get subsidy on cooking gas  cylinders.

The Central govt had already spent Rs.8000 on this fancy scheme without the sanction of Parliament. While the validity is under challenge before the Apex Court, the state govts are going ahead with the scheme in breakneck speed. People are cajoled and threatened by the state in various fora to rush and enrol failing which they will be denied several benefits. 

Opening a bank account be possible only when a citizen produces Adhaar card is another threat. What will happen to all these efforts, harassment to the public and the money spent already/being spent now, if the court strikes down the UID scheme?

Documents provided by consumer activists show that consumers wanting to avail non-Aadhaar-based LPG subsidy transfer need to make a submission that they will furnish the Aadhaar card to the bank once it is issued to them. One of the testimonies needed to be submitted by the non-Aadhaar card holders to the bank as well as the LPG distributor goes like this: "I confirm that I do not have Aadhaar number as on date. As soon as I receive the Aadhaar number, I will link the same to my LPG consumer number by giving a copy of the same to my distributor and also will get it linked to my bank account."

If a consumer does not give the Aadhaar card despite having it, he will face punishment under the Indian Penal Code for giving false information. 

Justice K S Puttaswamy, a retired judge of the High Court of Karnataka, who had moved the Supreme Court against the Aadhaar card, termed these measures contrary to the BJP's national manifesto and the Supreme Court directions.

"The interim orders passed by the Supreme Court on a batch of petitions on Aadhaar card have virtually scrapped the Unique Identity (UID) scheme. Yet, the government is pushing for it. The BJP is stepping back from its poll promises," said Justice Puttaswamy. The Centre was trying to push for the project by bringing in the National Identity Authority Bill in parliament.
Officials promoting this scheme believe that diversion of subsidised LPG can be checked through the UID. It is a bogus claim. The subsidised cylinders can be diverted even after making Aadhaar mandatory.

The percentage of diversion is now at a minimum as the oil companies have understood the problem and have taken many corrective measures. The OMCs have realised that a 14.25-kg cylinder will be enough for a family of four for 21 days. So nobody can avail a refill cylinder before 21 days. Another important measure is the IVRS system whereby the oil companies have stopped the distributors from accepting the request for a refill cylinder.

The consumers can directly call the IVRS number and the request is forwarded to the distributor. Whenever a bill is raised, the consumer gets an SMS alert. Unless the consumer colludes, there is no possibility of diversion of subsidised cylinder. According to a few studies during the past four years, Aadhaar - which is expected to check the misuse of government schemes for poor people - is a fraud.

Aadhaar was linked to the LPG delivery system to achieve the registration target, on which already Rs 8,000 crore has been spent. When the Centre realised that they were failing in this scheme due to lack of interest among the people, particularly the middle class, they linked LPG subsidised cylinders to Aadhaar.

These contradictions were brought to the notice of the courts by some activists. In the lower court, they failed. But, when they learnt about a PIL in the Supreme Court, they intervened in the petition. They expanded the argument by bringing discrepancies to the notice of the Apex Court.

They also expressed serious reservations over the UID, saying that US-based L-1 Identity Solutions, where one retired CIA director - George Tenet - is on the roll, has been assigned the task to execute the program. If we are conscious citizens, should we not file a batch of contempt of court petitions against the Centre, State Govts, banks and OMCs over the violation of its order?

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of merinews.com. In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.

- See more at: http://www.merinews.com/article/forcing-people-to-get-aadhaar-card-a-violation-of-supreme-court-order/15903228.shtml#sthash.BhMRWgf1.dpuf