In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

798 - Can Infosys Move Out Of Murthy’s Shadow ? - Business Forbes India

N.R. Narayana Murthy’s successor will have to be a bold risk-taker, open to radically new ideas. And some voices on the board think K.V. Kamath is the man for the job

by Mitu Jayashankar |     Nov 1, 2010
 S ometime last year, N.R. Narayana Murthy, chairman and chief mentor at Infosys Technologies, asked Jeffrey Lehman, chairman of the nominations committee at the company, if he could take time out to meet with M.S. ‘Vindi’ Banga over dinner in New York City. Lehman is entrusted with the task of finding Murthy’s successor by July next year. Banga, one of the front runners to take over as chief executive from Patrick Cescau at Unilever, the world’s largest consumer goods company, had just been beaten to the post by Paul Polman of Nestle. Murthy was keen for Banga to take over from him after his term ended. Not much is known how the conversation progressed that night.

Later in the year, Murthy invited Banga to Infosys’ headquarters in Bangalore to meet the others on the board. He’d pitched Banga to the others as a strong contender to his chair. At the meeting, Banga made a presentation on corporate governance, which he delivered with much élan. “I have enormous respect for Vindi. Yes, I’d like to see him on the board,” Murthy told Forbes India.

Soon after Banga left though, Lehman informally told Murthy the board would much rather back K.V. Kamath, non-executive chairman at ICICI Bank and an independent director on Infosys’ board. Kamath’s formidable reputation precedes him. Credited with building the largest private sector bank in the country, he’s got a lot going for him.

The younger leaders on the executive council (EC) at the company like him because they see him as the guy who asks all the tough questions at board meetings. To his credit though, he hasn’t shaken things up too much, perhaps in deference to Murthy’s presence. That said, fact remains, his tough guy image has spooked the founders a bit.

He’s popular with the second line of leaders at the company as well. They appreciate his incredible ability to groom professional CEOs, a breed almost missing at Infosys now because all along it has had one of the original promoters at the helm. Add to all of these the fact that Kamath is a Kannadiga — which can be handy when managing tricky political winds in Bangalore — and it’s pretty obvious why the board is rooting for him.

But Kamath isn’t the kind of man given to lobbying for a job and is said to have remained quiet through all the noise around him. Sources close to him say he wouldn’t mind taking on the challenge at Infosys. His legacy at ICICI bank is at the crossroads. Chanda Kochhar, his successor as chief executive, is now driving her own agenda. Besides, many of Kamath’s carefully nurtured CEOs have chosen to move out of the bank. It is a very different place now from what he had built.

Kamath declined to comment. Lehman says, “The board and founders have been thinking about it for quite some time. It’s a matter of great importance to this company. Murthy is a truly remarkable person and not easy to replace. The process of finding his successor is well on track.”


n the normal course of things, the appointment of a new non-executive chairman wouldn’t be such a life-altering decision for a company. But then, Infosys isn’t just another company. And neither is Murthy just another chairman. He was the best CEO and CFO rolled into one that the company ever had since the time it was founded in 1981. He’d figured how to manage the complex interplay among the co-founders.

He also attracted fierce loyalties. Last year, for instance, Mohandas Pai, the head of human resources at the firm, told Murthy he’d throw in the towel the day Murthy hung his boots up. Murthy didn’t take too kindly to that. He promptly spoke to the Nominations Committee and asked them to counsel Pai why it isn’t such a good idea.

Even as he did all of this, he built an amazingly predictable cash machine that delivered consistent margins. There was one other thing about Murthy: As CEO, he was always willing to put his neck on the line and take tough decisions. In 1995, when GE held a gun to his head to drop its rates, Murthy decided to pull the plug, well aware that he was sacrificing a quarter of his existing business. Not only did Infosys recover all the lost ground in less than a year, it went on to post double-digit growth next year.

The outcome today is a $4.8 billion company with operating margins of 33 percent, a market cap of $39 billion, which makes it bigger than Accenture and cash reserves of $3.9 billion, making it the bellwether for the Indian IT services business.

But the model he built (delivering offshore services for application development and maintenance) is aging now. “Whatever decisions he took — building campuses, training, processes and quality — were good in a different time. Now we need a new thought process,” says a senior executive at Infosys.