In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, November 27, 2010

877 - Privacy Bill a must to strengthen Aadhaa - Live Mint

Posted: Wed, Nov 24 2010. 10:34 PM IST

Privacy Bill a must to strengthen Aadhaar
 
We don’t question this lack of personal space. It is part of the compromise we make when we choose to live in India. And for the most part, no one has ever suffered because of it
Expert View | Rahul Matthan

We are not accustomed to privacy. We live our lives with little thought to the consequences of sharing personal information with neighbours and friends.

Sometimes, the nature of our social circumstance makes privacy irrelevant. In various parts of India, we name our children using traditional conventions that allow them to be identified accurately within the extended family tree of the community. For those of us who live in joint families, personal privacy is at a premium and never taken for granted.

We don’t question this lack of personal space. It is part of the compromise we make when we choose to live in India. And for the most part, no one has ever suffered because of it.

So why, after centuries of carelessly parting with intimate personal information, is a privacy legislation important today?

The government today collects vast quantities of personal information about its citizens, and has been doing so for over a decade. Yet, even though we are dealing with numbers far in excess of anything the Western world has had to handle, we face none of the personal privacy challenges that they suffer.

One reason for this is the inaccuracy of the data that is being collected. By some estimates, up to 20% of government databases are made up of ghosts—persons who are registered within the database, but who do not actually exist. While the obvious effect is inefficiency in the distribution of public services, the unintended consequence is a lack of trust in the database itself. When agencies look to verify identity, they ask for multiple documents, to be doubly and triply sure that the person they are dealing with is who he claims he is.

This coping strategy, made necessary by an inefficient data collection process, has protected us from data theft. Today, it is hard to steal identity in India, as the thief would need to obtain not just one, but many pieces of identity information.

Aadhaar, the most ambitious personal identification project ever attempted anywhere in the world, will create an infrastructure through which public services will be directed more accurately to their intended recipients. The social dividend that it generates will be huge.

But Aadhaar will have one unintended consequence that must not be overlooked. By promising accurate and unique identity, it will allow us to rely on just one piece of identity information. It will strip away the artificial protection that we have relied on all these years, laying us open to identity theft. So, is Aadhaar bad? Most certainly not. The social benefit that we, as a country, will derive from cleaning up our public distribution system will be enormous. The vast majority of our country that remains under-served by government machinery will, doubtlessly, gladly exchange personal privacy for better public service.

But at the same time, we need to be mindful of the law of unintended consequences. It would be a shame if a project with the game-changing potential of Aadhaar is questioned just because we have not enacted a privacy legislation.

Rahul Matthan, a founding partner of law firm Trilegal, has drafted an approach paper on the proposed legislation for a privacy and data protection law.

Respond to this column at feedback@livemint.com