In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

813 - Where living is costly and life is cheap - DNA Bangalore

Published: Monday, Nov 8, 2010, 8:45 IST
By Mathew Thomas | Place: Bangalore | Agency: DNA

Many years ago, newspapers reported an incident wherein an American consulate car ran over a pothole in then Bombay. The vehicle was damaged and a consulate official suffered minor injuries. The American sought damages from the Municipal Corporation of Bombay. This was promptly paid.

Since then, several millions of ‘desi’ citizens would have driven over potholes, suffered serious injuries and even died. One never hears of any claim for damages. Why? Well, we are different, aren’t we? Our ‘standards’ are different not only in cleanliness but in many other spheres as well. Why not? Why should we always imitate the West? Our culture is different and so are our standards.

As cultures go, our city has a unique blend of the West and the East. The well-heeled youth speak in accented English and do things that seem typically western. They could also be seen doing things very much Indian, at weddings or while celebrating festivals.

The government too has caught the disease of blended culture. There is talk of the high-tech city, with ‘signal-free’ roads, and use of IT in about everything one could possibly imagine. But while going about making this city another ‘Singapore’, as every politician and bureaucrat would proclaim, the government is unable to rid itself of the malaise of negligence bordering on the criminal. After all, have we not seen a good number of deaths due to the negligence of government functionaries?

There is a cardinal principle called public liability in every public work undertaken by authorities concerned. Proper auditing of such liability involves checking every phase of work to ensure minimum trouble and no loss of life and limb to the general public. In Bangalore, nobody has ever spoken of this public need and official virtue. Sad, indeed!

Here, one sees only neglect, not care. It is difficult to fathom why this should be so. The organisations that are responsible for such neglect have, as their heads, very competent people. Many are from the administrative service, which one presumes is meant to serve the people and not cause them injury through negligence. Perhaps, people and the government are equally apathetic and accept everything however slipshod it may be.

Just walk or drive along the city’s main road, named after the nation’s founding father. There is construction debris strewn everywhere. Drains are left open. Electric cables and steel rods protrude from these open drains. Walking along the footpaths is like going over an obstacle course. Our jawans could be trained there for moving on difficult terrain.

It is a simple thing to ensure that contractors remove the debris and fix the drain covers back in their respective places. Not doing so is a matter of attitude. ‘Why do anything now’ seems to be the attitude. People do not complain because they (rightly?) believe that there is no use in complaining. It would be a sheer waste of time and effort and in the bargain, one might also rub some politico or bureaucrat on the wrong side.

There have been extra-governmental organisations of eminent people with all good intentions and credentials, advising the government on many things, from town planning to good governance. There was BATF (Bangalore Agenda Task Force) once and there is now, its new avatar, ABIDe (Agenda for Bangalore Infrastructure Development). The dignitaries who adorn these impressive sounding bodies surely see the state of affairs.

Perhaps, they do ‘advise’, but their advice falls on deaf ears. How could political or bureaucratic ears be cured of such deafness?
It is not just in infrastructure construction that one finds such poor attention to dangers to human life. Take garbage collection. This is an area where there is a stream of experts telling how things could be improved. There are civic activists tirelessly working to change the way garbage is handled. Yet, one has never found a single mention of the horrid conditions in which those engaged in garbage collection do their job.

These people toil daily, sift through the muck with bare hands and feet, often sit in the dirt, and travel in vehicles that sprinkle a good part of the garbage along the way. What work-related diseases they would suffer from is still being ignored. They are part of the ‘unorganised’ sector. What diseases they would spread, also does not bother the officials responsible or the public.

It is not that we do not have laws to punish those guilty of spreading diseases or acting negligently. A number of sections of the Penal Code deal with such conduct. Section 268 is about public nuisance, section 269 is on spreading infectious diseases and section 283 deals with danger or obstruction in public way. It is high time people used these provisions to bring to account their government. Who would like to bell this cat?
— The author is secretary, Citizen’s Action Forum, Bangalore