In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, November 15, 2010

839 - Indian IT cos shift focus to domestic market instead of US- Economic Times

5 NOV, 2010, 06.30AM IST,ET BUREAU
BANGALORE: 

  
Growing in the shadow of larger software services peers, Indian product firms are beginning to make a mark, as they shift focus to finding solutions for the domestic market instead of attempting to ape product ideas in the developed markets of the US.

During a discussion organised by The Economic Times with Nasscom, entrepreneurs such as Sridhar Vembu of online office software maker Zoho, Duke University professor Vivek Wadhwa, Nasscom president Som Mittal and CEO of Zinnov Management Consulting Pari Natarajan said Indian entrepreneurs are learning from their failures and are now scripting the next version of the Indian product story.

The roundtable is part of a series of such discussions being organised to celebrate ET’s 25 years in Bangalore — the Silicon Valley of India.

“India’s IT revolution is about 20 years old right now and you have thousands of people with over 10 years of experience who are tired of working for other people. This entire cadre of people will become entrepreneurs,” says Vivek Wadhwa, director of research, Center for Entrepreneurship and Research Commercialisation, Duke University.

Indian start-ups also have a larger support system to grow new companies. Risk capital flow into the country has been higher over the past year with nearly $6.6 billion of private equity funding across 38 transactions as per data available with Venture Intelligence. Incubation centres and new models of start-up funding, including entrepreneur-in-residence programmes, and a growing number of angel investors are helping to kickstart new models of entrepreneurship.

Nearly a decade after the Indian software services industry moved into the global spotlight, a new wave of innovation is emerging in the country’s technology sector. Software product development in sectors such as education and training, artificial intelligence and automation, recruitment and talent management, mobile and telecom are triggering what industry observers believe will be the third wave in the country’s software revolution.

“I believe we are at the right cusp at this point of time, because we have been through one cycle with the software services group,” says Som Mittal, president of Nasscom who feels India now has a pool of mentors with experience and capital to nurture young companies.

In the last three years, software product exports have grown to reach a revenue level of $ 1.14 billion, according to a report by industry body Nasscom. Over 125 start-up companies have been set up in this period with an eye on businesses emerging from multiple sources such as the launch of the UID project — the world’s largest biometric project that is slated to throw up new business of $4 billion by 2015.

New trends in technology such as cloud computing and the exploding mobile market are also driving software product development by a pool of highly skilled technologists across the country.

The hour-long interaction threw up three key factors that will determine the progress of start-up enterprises in this space — a vibrant ecosystem, right talent to build companies and, most important of all, the risk-taking ability of entrepreneurs.

“In India, you are not meeting a market need, you are creating it. It is not about market share. If you have a really good product you can reach out and really create a market for yourself here,” says Mr Mittal who sees the role of industry bodies today as facilitators.

“We have more than 3,000 people exchanging ideas on the (Nasscom) blog. We intervene when we think we need to provide some thoughts there, we have to find newer models to scale,” he added.

Industry observers also reckon that for Indian entrepreneurs the big test will be to create business models that address the domestic market.

“Indian companies cannot solve American problems whereas the opportunities here are so great, as the economy will grow at 8-12% a year over the next decade, while the American economy is stagnant, at best it will grow at 3%, if lucky,” says Mr Wadhwa.

As the start-up community gathers behind this emerging wave, support from policy and higher risk-taking by entrepreneurs will determine the progress of this tryst with technology.