In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, November 27, 2010

876 - Meeting on UID at IAS Association, Infantry Road on 23rd Nov 2010 by Rajeev Manikoth

Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:04 AM
 
Meeting on UID at IAS Association, Infantry Road on 23rd Nov 2010
By Rajeev Manikoth

I was slightly disappointed that there was no one from the UID body to engage with. But all the same it made for some interesting views, including the demo of how easily biometrics could be so easily forged.

Mr.Vidyashankar is a dedicated government official and has naturally taken pride in achieving no.1 status in Karnataka in getting the UID data capturing process going in a short while. He was also eloquent in how tech savvy his team was and were "brilliantly" implementing it. And many more like him across the country will be focussed on implementing a "directive" without really looking at the larger context.

The real worry is that I think we are getting a trifle too caught up in battling the technology - whether it will be accurate, possibilities of duplication, forgery etc. These are aspects that can always be countered. What if they do evolve a foolproof technology to implement this?
( Technology apart, we have a Director in the MHA selling out confidential data ! )

I believe that our focus needs to be on the core issue of the Aadhar concept itself, it's real intent ...  and why it needs to be scrapped.

India is now being viewed as a "market" with huge ROI. Take a billion plus people and see how they can be "milked". The whole business of emerging private micro finance corporations are an example. There are thousands of business plans and models being conceived for our rural hinterland. And believe me the goal is not the uplifting of the masses!

( I had voiced this in the meeting and am not surprised to see it in the article posted today : Money Life Article )
 
What is immensely frightening is the fact that there are some people sitting in high places and scheming these policies as a business equation. And the citizenry are blissfully unaware, just don't care or comes to know too late.

Food security for India is going to be a major issue. We see the initial rumblings already with cases like Monsanto, the sad reality of food rotting in inefficient inadequate storage facilities. A minister and PM who would rather stick to policy and let millions of our own people starve. Huge tracts of agricultural land being diverted for other purposes. The West and institutions like the World Bank work on the principle of creating dependencies. If India does not take a hard stand that guarantees freedom and liberty in all its development goals, and define policies that give our people and resources first priority, we are going to be in big trouble. I am afraid that UID will be only one of the major issues.

But first, we as a nation need to be able to clearly define the idea of what "development" should be for India from our own context, independent of all biases.
 
All policies will then need to be based on this.

Can development be separated from political interests?
Daunting indeed knowing the reality of our current political crop!
 
The real "convergence" that is happening, to my mind is that of "immense profit" bring together the politicians, the corporations, mediahouses, middlemen, PR agencies and other species inbetween ...